this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
212 points (92.7% liked)

Games

32669 readers
598 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

$700, and the side by sides look barely different, from my perspective. The chat seemed to have the same opinion.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 102 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Wouldn't it be funny if like no one bought it

Like that's obviously not gonna happen but like wouldn't it be funny

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 75 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I thought the same thing about Concord, and then no one did buy it, and that too was funny.

[–] ViscloReader@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Things like this actually makes me sad because you know who to blame for the games failure yet you also know who will take the blame and who will leave with a golden parachute.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 43 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Would be funnier if only scalpers bought it and couldn't unload them.

[–] garretble@lemmy.world 79 points 2 months ago (22 children)

$700 is too much money. Especially if you already have a PS5.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago

$200 extra for reflections between cars in GT7 or slightly better shadow resolution is not worth it IMO.

My PS5 already collects dust as it is, since there are next to no games that actually make use of its hardware that I cannot already buy on PC to run at higher settings.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 62 points 2 months ago (8 children)

You could buy a pretty nice PC for $700

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Which could play MS and Sony games. I don’t think consoles make much sense nowadays.

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And the best part is you don't have to pay for online and you won't need to rebuy your games each new console generation.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (8 children)

First one I’ll grant you, but there was no rebuying from last gen to current gen for anything non-Nintendo.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It did when the ps5 first came out. $500 for it was a steal back then. I wanted to build a PC at the time but due to the crazy GPU prices and low stock for other parts I decided it was best to wait. Got a ps5 instead (was also hard to get as well) and thought it was absolutely worth the price for the experience it offered. Just built the pc I wanted last fall shortly after prices started dropping. First time ever I made a good choice.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] B0NK3RS@lemmy.world 53 points 2 months ago

That's a lot of money for a generation that just isn't worth it.

[–] simple@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago (15 children)

Darn, I posted this earlier but sadly lemm.ee is having server issues. This'll be the main thread, then.

Official Blog Post | PS5 Pro Reveal Trailer

The PS5 Pro console will be available this holiday at a manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP) of $699.99 USD, £699.99 GBP, €799.99 EUR, and ¥119,980 JPY (includes tax). It will include a 2TB SSD, a DualSense wireless controller and a copy of Astro’s Playroom pre-installed in every PS5 Pro purchase. PS5 Pro is available as a disc-less console, with the option to purchase the currently available Disc Drive for PS5 separately.

The big question mark for me is that not only does it cost 800 euros, it does NOT come with a disc drive. There is no version of it with a disc drive like the PS5, you have to buy it as an accessory. I guess physical games really are going away.

[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 18 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Yeah. Almost no one I know buys physical anything anymore. Kinda sad to see it go. We really need to instill some better laws around ownership of digital goods.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

No disc drive and no fucking vertical stand/mount.

And yeah. Sony actually tried to "kill" physical games years ago with the PSP Go (?). But that was still when Gamestop and Best Buy were power houses and there was a lot of threats of "okay. We will give all the good shelf space to MS and Nintendo" and that went away fast.

But now brick and mortar are basically dead and everyone is periodically pissed at Amazon because they did an unsanctioned 2 dollar discount on a new game. So we are seeing the return.

In theory it annoys me because the playstations have always been okay-good media players and I have one of the gundam breakers on a physical disc because that was the cheapest way to get all the DLC. But for higher end digital media we are missing the codecs (because money) and physical digital media as a whole is going away. So... probably the right decision to wean people off it.

That said: Charging extra for the fucking vertical stand is just insane since a lot of us had tv stands that cannot fit the PS5 horizontally. But also, considering this looke like it is a bit taller/longer, it also can't fit it vertically so... Even more reason to build a new HTPC over the next few years.


Remap, but also Rob Zacny (so you can never tell how much is actually a bit), did a REALLY good bit where they immediately priced out the new Remarkable with all the expensive attachments and... it is still (probably) cheaper than a PS5 Pro with a disc drive and a stand.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If consoles want to remain relevant in the age of the gaming PC, they have to try harder than being locked-down gaming PCs.

Free and simple multiplayer, subsidised hardware, and physical game ownership were staples of most consoles for years but now the urge to turn every device into an "everything machine" has kneecapped the very purpose of these devices.

At best, these are slightly less hassle and slightly more social than a gaming PC. At worst, they're as anti-social and user-hostile without the cost benefit that once made them genuinely preferable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The side-by-sides are definitely diminished returns compared to earlier gens where hardware bumps had very noticeable gains.

I am sure the performance is measurably better than the base PS5, but I don't think it's $200-plus-separate-disc-drive better.

I also found the game choices they used for some of these comparisons to be odd picks. Sure you have "Made for PS5" exclusives like the new Ratchet and Clank, Returnal, and Spider-Man 2, but they also heavily showcased:

  • The Last of Us Part 2

  • God of War: Ragnarok

  • Ghost of Tsushima

  • Horizon: Forbidden West

  • Control

All of those are last-gen games that received PS5 enhancements. Being on a base PS5, I already feel like I am getting the "better" experience compared to the default for those games, so why upgrade?

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well, as a PC gamer, there's a bunch of settings you can turn on from "last Gen" games to make them look better. Just because they ran on those machines doesn't mean you were getting the best version. If you're playing on console you're never getting the best version. This newer one can just turn on more settings and a higher resolution and framerate than the previous ones. I wish they'd let players decide what settings they want themselves, but sadly that's not happening on console anytime soon I don't think.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Chasing the "best version" is a fool's errand, though. Unless you're buying top-of-the-line hardware every cycle, you'll never have the best. And even then, there are games that seem to target future hardware by having settings so high not even top-end PCs can max them out comfortably, and other games that are just so badly optimized they'll randomly decide they hate some feature of your setup and tank the performance, too.

Everyone has their threshold for what looks good enough, and they upgrade when they reach that point. I used my last PC for 10 years before finally upgrading to a newer build, and I'm hoping to use my current one as long as well.

But just based on the displayed difference in performance between the base PS5 and the PS5 Pro, it doesn't seem like a good investment for what benefits you get. It's like paying Apple prices for marginally better hardware, and with overpriced ~~wheels~~ disc drive sold separately.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why not go PC at this point. Modern consoles are locked pre-built PCs and paying $700 for a locked system is crazy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I already feel like a chump for getting the PS5. There's hardly any games for it. Hell, there are some games I can't play on it. I can't imagine what's changed so drastically in the last couple years to even be worth an upgrade.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Aielman15@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

This generation is already pretty weak, and it was hard to justify the original PS5 which, after a whopping four years, still has too few exclusive titles to justify the increased price point. Now they are asking for $700 (and they increased the controller's price, too), but there's still too few next gen titles, and it doesn't even come with basic features like a disc tray and a vertical mount. Not even a better form factor, it's the same old ugly case, but somehow bigger.

The only premium thing about this thing is the price tag. $700 dollars but €800, because apparently they are dominating the European market so much that they don't even have to try to sell it at an honest price point. With all those money you can just buy a PC. I honestly don't think that many people who are interested in the console market (which, historically, has always been a "low budget" entry into modern gaming) would be willing to spend so much money on one.

I guess we circled back to the PS3 era, when Sony got drunk with overconfidence. Only, this time they'll get away with it because their main competitor is somehow even more incompetent than them. I wonder if the handheld PC market will pose a threat to their dominance in the future - at the moment, it's a very small niche.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Awesome, I can pay $700 to play Bloodborne in 30 fps

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 months ago

Sony’s problems are twofold:

  • They are charging an absurd amount of money for a game console
  • They are selling a game console that has practically no first party games for it.

If they had plenty of the latter, they could weather this. But there are still games releasing for the PS4, and they have had 1, maybe 2 PS5 releases that would qualify as first party this year (that don’t bubble down to PC).

[–] Swarfega@lemm.ee 16 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Not worth it. The PS5 games catalogue is piss poor compared to when the PS4 Pro released.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 14 points 2 months ago

Kinda hard to make a solid catalogue when you follow the live service trend and your projects flop one after another.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] De_Narm@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (9 children)

I'm still waiting for a reason to get a PS5 at all, everything I've been interested still got released on PS4 too - except for one single game.

I really don't care for better specs anymore, I probably couldn't even tell PS4 and PS5 games apart without a side-by-side comparison. Not to mention, to see a difference at all I'd need a new TV on top of the console. Not gonna happen anytime soon.

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

One major improvement with the PS5 is the instant loading times. I don't think this thing will be any faster in that regard but it's a major improvement over the PS4. The other improvement over my original PS4 is that it doesn't sound like a jet engine after 20 minutes of running.

Ray tracing is cool but what console games are even using it at this point? It's like them advertising "8K capable" as if anyone gives a shit about that during a time that 4k is just barely becoming the standard for most.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Are there enough exclusives to justify buying one? 🤔

[–] 100@fedia.io 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If you have to ask, not really no.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MeatStiq@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

I love the price. At $700 it's just what I needed to convince my friend who was holding out for the pro to move on to PC. $700 buys a pretty decent AMD card nowadays. Shit for $800 we're talking decent refurbished gaming PCs.

[–] zib@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

The PS5 is already a very powerful piece of hardware that most devs aren't making full use of. I honestly can't see any justification in a hardware upgrade other than some Sony execs thinking it'll be the end of the world if they don't put out something new to make some profit line continue to go up.

[–] antithetical@lemmy.deedium.nl 12 points 2 months ago

So far I've traded in all my Playstations for the latest versions. But this price-hike and no disc-drive are a dealbreaker. Guess I'm going for a new gaming PC and a Steam Deck now. Too bad Sony, you messed up.

[–] QubaXR@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's a pity SONY didn't have any games to announce alongside the new console. There is nothing or there I feel like I need more power to play, and I already completed games they demoed, sometimes years ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ah, continuing with the ugly AF design language I see. Guess I'm skipping the entire PS5 gen then. See you guys for the PS6!

[–] TownhouseGloryHole@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

No kidding. I am shocked they somehow made it even uglier. Was really hoping for a simpler, less obnoxious design.

[–] djidane535@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

At the beginning of this generation, I planned to buy a used PS5 when the Pro version was coming. I did not know that the PS5 would have almost no games for me (especially because they released the big ones for me on PC), the base PS5 would cost even more, and most people will not upgrade to the Pro because of its absurd pricing (note because it’s not worth it, but because the market for it is likely very niche).

I guess I will just skip Sony’s platform for this generation.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

SIX HUNDRED AND NINETY NINE US DOLLARS

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PunchingWood@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

The price increase is insane. That does not seem to scale in comparison with what you'll get in return over a regular PS5, especially if you're gonna be forced to buy the digital editions from the PS store, which are outside of the sales often the most expensively priced versions too, I've practically only bought second-hand discs for my PS5 because of that.

So either games will start running at higher framerates on real 4K, like 60FPS and up. Or developers will get lazy and stop bothering to optimise for the older generation of PS5, which will then be an excuse to upgrade to the more expensive edition to play at 4K and/or 60FPS.

I really hope the latter won't be a thing for the sake of both players and game development, there's been enough unoptimised shit lately and I hope we can move forward again.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ZeroTwo@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They need to pump out more games to justify this. I see no reason to upgrade as mine already sits and collects dust. The controller is super awesome tho, use it all the time for my PC.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›