this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
505 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19239 readers
2939 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Skua@kbin.earth 151 points 4 months ago (5 children)

This feels like a very foolish move. I do not know the relevant law at all, but surely it's some kind of illegal to falsely use someone's face to claim their political endorsement? And it's not like Taylor Swift is somehow lacking in either the financial clout to sue over it or the PR clout to turn it around

If this fucking walloper wants to ruin his own campaign then that's more than fine by me. I'm just surprised by what seems like such an obviously poor move

[–] g0zer@lemmy.world 52 points 4 months ago

Honestly, poor political moves seem to be all the man is capable of. And his base (unfortunately) always seems to have just enough cognitive dissonance to eat it up and pivot/shift the goalposts.

More and more, I come to the conclusion that the only way forward is to stop fighting them, and instead focus on strengthening us.

The one thing MAGA republicans have in spades is a sense of unity and community, which is something we on the left need to foster (instead of infighting and segmentation).

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's his superpower. No matter how low your opinion of him gets he can always find a way to surprise you with how shitty he can be.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] smokebuddy@lemmy.today 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

From what I understand, Taylor Swift was offered big time FTX money but her parents are competent legal professionals who reviewed the contract, recognized that SBF was selling dangerous unregistered securities, and advised to stay the fuck away from that shit. I think she may have been the only celebrity who avoided that dump truck of money to protect her fans and her brand.

Not someone I'd fuck around with. (also remember when Evermore theme park tried suing lol)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 116 points 4 months ago (6 children)

The images. Trump is pathetic.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 83 points 4 months ago (2 children)

And as we all know... Swifties sure love commenting on Truth Social.

🙄

This dude is just so, so desperate. Future historians will have to go through all this garbage.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 46 points 4 months ago

This is one of the most pathetic things I have ever seen. I still cannot believe a massive cult of dimwits worships this loser.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This is exactly what bullshit like Grok is here for. Stupid easy to make, stupid easy to spread. Why try any harder when your target is stupid people ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I'm surprised I haven't seen any "trump for Harris" generated images yet in this thread. Maybe with a news article about Trump finding Trump's VP pick weird and how he can't stand Trump rambling about Trump, low energy, something something.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 80 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Another lawsuit to take away the last of the money he might have. He's clearly burning all bridges and preparing to bug off to Russia, NK, or Chyyyyna.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 76 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Using AI to take away a woman’s agency and force an image of her to do what you want?

Trump feels free to do it and to do it publicly. It’s weird as all hell.

[–] Huckledebuck@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 months ago

When you're a celebrity, they let you do it.

[–] Minarble@aussie.zone 70 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This is hilarious he is going to force a Swift - Harris endorsement where she might have remained silent

[–] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Exactly this. If Taylor swift gets the swifties to the polls it’s game over.

And he might get sued as well which would be the cherry on top

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago

I mean I would be stunned if this doesn't result in a lawsuit of some form. This is a pretty messed up (and unbelievably dumb) thing to do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 65 points 4 months ago

There'd better be a Swift response.

^^^Sorry ^^^not ^^^sorry.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 61 points 4 months ago (4 children)

How the fuck is there no consequences for this?

[–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 43 points 4 months ago (3 children)

They figured out that lawsuits take longer than the election news cycle, so they can get away with the misinformation long enough for their purposes. Even if they were to get a C&D order quickly, it may have reached enough people that matter to them, and by the time they get any actual consequences the election is probably over.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)

because it’s been like… a second

there very well might be consequences- taylor swift probably isn’t too pleased, and she has the money to sue… but law suits take time

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

They do take a very, veeery long time when it comes to this guy. Thats for sure.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The fans will be the consequence. He stepped in something that's not just a lawsuit he can delay. He just pissed off all the Swifties who are very aware of her repudiation of the GOP and Trump. He may have just sent the DNC thousands of new volunteers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Don’t mess with the Swifties, Donny. Of all the dumb shit you’ve done you’re really playing with fire now.

[–] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Forget the Swifties. Don’t mess with Taylor herself. Donald has stepped in it, and now Taylor is all but required to correct the record.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago

There's a certain irony in sending out your VP to call any woman without the requisite 2.3 kids a "cat lady", then turn around and announce to a credulous base that America's most famous cat lady just gave you her endorsement.

[–] catbum@lemmy.world 47 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

I feel like I'm stating the obvious here, but this seems so off-the-charts guaranteed to backfire on him. What even mild Swiftie isn't going to figure out (or hasn't already) just how fake this endorsement is? Of any celeb to fake, Taylor seems like a such a flamingly dumb choice in terms of the fandom's social media engagement.

With all these increasingly stupid moves... Is he really that detached and senile, or is there more behind his [team's] style of psycho-political warfare going on?

I don't think I've seen it pondered anywhere on social media, so I must ask: Does it not seem like Trump is purposely trying to throw the election at this point? If that's the case, I fear the heightened degree of nefarious intent for whatever guaranteed political unrest we will face in November. I don't think this is baseless conspiratorial thinking on my part, unfortunately.

Or ... Or ... Maybe his patently obvious mental decline has eroded away just enough of his super-sized ego to let in juuust enough reality for him to consciously recognize that he is going to die soon whether he likes it or not, and now he doesn't give a shit-a-minute if he wins anymore. Can you imagine?

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't think he's trying to throw the election. I think he's a tired old man struggling as he's faced with a crowd increasingly tired of a schtick he's been running for almost a decade. I've said it before but I think people want new material, and he's too old and set in his ways to reinvent himself. He's tossing out the same old classics, but they're not hitting like they were in 2016, and it vexes him. And this is not the first time it happened, either. I didn't know this, but it was pointed out that after the first hit season ratings of "The Apprentice" quickly plummeted over the years. Trump struggles to keep interest once the novelty value wears off.

On top of that, yes, he is clearly and obviously deteriorating mentally and it's a huge indictment to the media that nobody is giving that the same attention they gave Biden's decline. Even MSNBC (who's openly anti Trump) isn't really focusing enough on his cognitive decline.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 46 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

He's clearly been primed to use bogus generative AI content to help his campaign. But in typical Trump fashion he's managed to ~~heavy-handedly~~ hamfistedly botch it.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 24 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Might I recommend the word "hamfistedly"? It's honestly a wonderful word to use about a lot of things that come out of the Trump operation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 39 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That is good! He will piss off Taylor Swift with that move, who will turn the Swifties towards Harris.

[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 16 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Are there really swifties that are Trump supporters? I mean, probably, but like, come on

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The big thing it might do is mobilize the squirrels to hide....

I swear I typed "Swifties to vote" but my phone decided "squirrels to hide"was better.

[–] randomsnark@lemmy.ml 14 points 4 months ago

in my experience, most things will mobilize the squirrels to hide

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip 39 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is such a bad move for his campaign, this is going to force her to release a statement, if she doesn't sue.

She probably wasn't going to endorse any candidate since that's the smart move as an entertainer... but I wouldn't be surprised if she just endorses Harris very publicly now to get ahead of any stain on her reputation.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago (2 children)

He is about to find out what a REAL rabid fanbase looks like. Swifties are fucking crazy yo.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 34 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think she’s beautiful — very beautiful! I find her very beautiful. I think she’s liberal. She probably doesn’t like Trump. I hear she’s very talented,” he said. “I think she’s very beautiful, actually — unusually beautiful!

FOR ONCE. IN YOUR FUCKING LIFE. DON'T BE WEIRD.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Boomer falls for deep fake endorsement from someone who hates him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 25 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Everyone has seen his act time and time again.

Step 1: Falsely accuse someone you don't like of doing X.

Step 2: Do X.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I’ll just leave this here.

[–] rotkehle@feddit.org 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

is the guy reloading his finger pistol?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 20 points 4 months ago

The popcorn factories have doubled their shifts in anticipation

[–] myusernameis@lemmy.ca 20 points 4 months ago

Donald, You need to calm down. You know all too well there's some bad blood between us. Never in your wildest dreams would I endorse the smallest man/hands that ever lived.

Now look what you made me do, don't blame me if my fans try some vigilante shit. This isn't a love story, it's karma, and you're guilty as sin.

So shake it off and stick to campaigning in Florida, it's only August after all.

You're on your own kid, -T

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Let me get this straight, you think that Taylor Swift, one of the wealthiest and most powerful women in the world, with legions of loyal fans, is not going to retaliate against your public lies?

Good luck.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Everybody hated that

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

"TYLER SWEFT DID A VOTING FOR TRUMP!!! VERY TRUTH!!!!! SAD!!!! NICE!!!!!!"

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

Time to sue for Libel. DJT could only dream of having lawyers as good as Taylor Swift has. I sense another multi-million dollar money judgement coming.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 12 points 4 months ago

Trump thinks Swift is still a country star.

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He wants the endorsements of celebrities sooo bad. 😂

[–] RangerJosie@sffa.community 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What? You mean Rob Schneider, Keven Sorbo, and Kid Rock aren't turning out crowds for him?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›