this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
130 points (94.5% liked)
Chapotraphouse
14157 readers
626 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
capital controls the US and if elections were publicly funded and no PACs were allowed then there would be no AIPAC to control US policy in israel’s favor
with that being said i absolutely do not support removing people’s posts simply for saying israel controls the US. its definitely a miscalculated statement but unless its specifically about jewish people then removing comments like that, intentionally or not does not help with the “israel controls america” shit they already think. i think its also kinda fucked up to take people’s ability to voice their frustrations about the state of our country away. so many laws in the US exist to protect israel. so much of our politics is just “how would you protect israel?”. everyone on tv is a zionist spewing israeli propaganda. you’re gonna push people to the wrong side of hating israel if you start removing posts criticizing the israeli state, which has nothing to do with jewish people
i just do not see anything wrong with saying X country controls Y country. people are allowed to be wrong. if they make it about jews then yeah remove and ban because thats not someone who can be educated or reasoned with but israel is a state and they do not represent jewish people so i just really don’t see how its useful for anything other than unintentionally protecting israel from criticism
I also wanna note ive never even characterized it like this, i've been pushing back on the seeming idea that there's NO INFLUENCE AT ALL, WHATSOEVER, which seems really hard to believe when we're literally discussing it because of the existence of a PAC that exists for the express purpose of influencing American politics, and this is like the above board influencing project that is KNOWN about. The country that sent thousands of explosive pagers to do a terror attack isn't going to even attempt to influence its "liege" state to keep giving it whatever the fuck it wants? It's easy enough to just throw your hands up and be like "well the U.S. is just going to give them whatever they want anyway" but that isn't really exactly a stellar analysis and it's just the result of thinking "well, it's the unsinkable aircraft carrier, america NEEDS it" and terminating thought there. Great job you really solved it!
P.s. regarding AIPAC i noted in another comment bemoaning associating them with being foreign that their literal fucking name emphasizes their being Israeli first, it's "American Israeli" not the "Israeli american" PAC. That's a choice. It's like how calling the CPC the "chinese communist party" tries to paint them as a Han nationalist thing whereas the "Communist Party of China" doesn't.