You know it's funny. I'm getting called a lib by the left, which I am ironically part of and a dudebro by you, science person, of which group I am also a part of. Plant protein and animal protein having no difference in muscle development has been know forever. Studied in detail by millions of athletes on their own bodies. Your comment assumes I do not appreciate the data produced by this study, which is false.

Just because you don't like my comment does not mean you get to define me.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Uh...ok?

Your comment assumes I do not appreciate the data produced by this study, which is false.

It was actually your comment that gave this impression...

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

Impression: Having an opinion about something, often based on observation. Assumption: Something you accept without evidence.

Until you provide some evidence, you do not have the impression that I view this data to be useless, you have an assumption. You can most certainly have the impression that I was unkind though, as that's based on your feeling, which you seem to base this on. Either way, impressions can still be wrong. Which it was.

I thought I was supposed to be the science naysayer here?