this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2025
830 points (98.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

35326 readers
3832 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Eeehh, you're literally suggesting that AWS added to the general stability and dependability of the internet in general

You have NO idea what you're talking about

The internet was designed to survive nuclear war, talking about being dependable) and the entire idea was (and should continue to be) that you don't rely on a single point of failure. Traffic should automatically route around dead nodes so that everything continues to flow. Decentralisation is key.

But of course with companies being companies and corporate doing what corporate does best (enshittify everything so that we make more monies) everything got centralized.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The centralization is an issue, but AWS is stable as hell. When I was first in IT, tech support, I had to explain to customers daily that, "No, your internet is fine, it's just that particular website that's down."

And the centralization wouldn't be a thing if AWS didn't route all IAM services through us-east-1. My Lightsail in us-west-1 was fine yesterday.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So your argument is that AWS centralization is good because Amazon is a good provider?

You do understand that they're are loads of providers out there that are perfectly stable, but that are not Amazon?

I've never used it because I know how to manage a server, something you might want to expect from IT personnel that does development for companies, but there days let's just ask Amazon todo it for us, we're too lazy

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Companies need hell of a lot more then virtual machines today. I dont use it personally either but would i recommend a company to buy their own hardware? No. I would say they should use AWS because they can afford it and it gives them access to hundreds of services. Its rare to see technical issues.

The value for a company is actually enormous, to have something like that at their fingertips.

Todays downtime is forgotten in a few days and it was a big one.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Who says companies need to buy their own hardware?

We have datacenters for that, you rent the hardware one way or the other.

I'm saying that nobody should put all their eggs in one basket because if that basket breaks, you're all fucked.

If you have the need for high availability then you don't out all your servers in a single datacenter, or with a single provider

If everyone and their mother is with one provider, you'll first notice that said provider gets expensive pretty quick and you'll also notice that when shit goes down that half the fucking internet follows.

My services weren't down, and never have been. I don't use AWS, because I don't need it

[–] CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah rack space was killing it! Sites NEVER went down, especially under dynamic load. Never.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

You understand that that has nothing to do with this? So there are shitty providers out there, find a good one that is not "just amazon"