Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
Cite a study that concludes the number of circumcised boys grow up to resent their parents for it statistically approaches 100%.
edit: I'm not making a value statement one way or the other about circumcising or not circumcising. I'm purely reacting to the claim that a circumcised boy will grow up to resent their parents.
Lol blocked
Excellent use of "show me the study" to discredit someone without providing your own study to back up your contrary point of view.
And top notch denial of axes to grind, positioning yourself as neutral whilst criticizing others.
Might not work in a court of law, but it's strong internet debate fallacy usage.
I didn't make a claim either way. I just said the OP's claim was unfounded, and it is unless and until they provide a study that backs it up.
I don't really know what you mean by denial of axes to grind. I'm not asserting that no circumcised boy has resentment over it. Of course the truth is going to be somewhere between 0% and 100%. I'm just saying we should have some actual data about where that percentage really lies. And I'm not positioning myself as neutral on the topic, I was just pointing out that that specific comment of mine was unrelated to circumcision.
I would love to see non-medically necessary circumcision be a thing of the past, but I'm not going to go and make statistical claims I can't backup about it.
What the fuck are you even on about?! OP already conceded that it was an overly broad and hyperbolic claim.
You literally wrote that directly above
You're fucking lying that you don't have a viewpoint when you're up and down this thread demanding scientific studies from people who are sharing the experiences of themselves and people they know, and all of your "innocently neutral requests for scientific studies" are on one side of the debate and not the other.
It's hypocritical, disingenuous, dismissive, dehumanizing and a logical fallacy that anyone with a different viewpoint to you has to have scientific studies backing up every point they make. It's a shitty and vacuous debating technique.
Maybe, just maybe, the people in this thread who remember having a foreskin and don't now (or whose friends have talked to them about that) have the most insight into what difference it makes to have a foreskin, and you could try respecting their opinion rather than demanding scientific proof that their experience is universal.