this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
377 points (99.2% liked)

World News

50123 readers
3440 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Outside a train station near Tokyo, hundreds of people cheer as Sohei Kamiya, head of the surging nationalist party Sanseito, criticizes Japan’s rapidly growing foreign population.

As opponents, separated by uniformed police and bodyguards, accuse him of racism, Kamiya shouts back, saying he is only talking common sense.

Sanseito, while still a minor party, made big gains in July’s parliamentary election, and Kamiya's “Japanese First” platform of anti-globalism, anti-immigration and anti-liberalism is gaining broader traction ahead of a ruling party vote Saturday that will choose the likely next prime minister.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 13 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Racism and xenophobia aside, how many humans do we need? Our poor earth. A declining population is probably an ok thing. I think it's the capitalist class ringing the alarm bell as they see their profit forecasts take a blow. How many hundreds of millions should that island hold?

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 minutes ago* (last edited 3 minutes ago)

Ideally, you evenly distribute the young, working people that are available on Earth. Japan has too few, Africa has gobs. (Although I don't even know if the trickle of foreigners they're taking in are from high-birth places)

Unfortunately, whatever the local majority group is is against whatever group isn't, and that's how you get history, and history happening again.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

This vid explains the situation better than I can (it's about South Korea but Japan is basically in the same boat)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ufmu1WD2TSk

From a higher abstraction vantage point, you are not wrong, but you are basically advocating for entire countries to disappear

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

If the entire country wants to enact policies and cultures that would lead to their disappearance then who are we to tell them otherwise?

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Well it's also the pension system that will become hard to financially sustain. Generally you want the population to at least kind of replace itself to avoid economic upheaval.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

While true, that's an inherently unsustainable model. Pensions need to be self-sustaining, rather than relying on the next generation to pay for them. It's ridiculous that one generation basically got a free generation and now every generation afterwards is paying the previous generation's retirement

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

There's the quantatitve thing of currency, but also simply the reality that people actually have to work to provide the things the retired people need. In this case the money issue is modeling a more intrinsic issue. With fewer young workers the retirement age has to go up to maintain a viable ratio of non-workers to workers. Yes technology and such can also help things for the better, but roughly that's the state of things.