this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
920 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

75605 readers
2139 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] leastaction@lemmy.ca 36 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

It seems to me that part of the problem is overreliance on phones as computing devices. A lot of things, like banking, are best done on an actual computer. We have become too dependent on phones.

[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Maybe we have this view because when we refer to computers we see a more open ecosystem that's not found in the mobile phone era. I want that same liberty with my phone. When the word "sideloading" has disappeared, I think then we have known something has changed.

[–] aliser@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

no it's not. takes me 2 seconds to log in into my banking up in my phone. anything basic will take a few taps to do (eg transfer money).

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 17 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

Your phone has likely much better security for your banking apps than your computer, unless you run really niche setup like QubesOS.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 hour ago

You say "security" I say "a bug that won't let me log in". Which is it?

[–] traceur402@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

We as a society should be rethinking the term "security", if it's come to mean submitting to being jerked around however best suits some private company's interests instead of our own. If there's a central platform for its security benefit it should be democratically controlled instead of controlled by what are effectively feudal lords, or perhaps even an occupying force

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 2 points 42 minutes ago* (last edited 42 minutes ago) (1 children)

The security I am talking about has nothing to do with being locked down. Linux could easily implement the same, but it probably never will, because it requires a bit of central management and vision. And Linux really struggles with that.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 1 points 11 minutes ago

You're responding downthread of QubesOS being mentioned

Sure it's hard to get that kind of security onto mainstream distros. But it exists.

[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (3 children)

I'm not sure how it works the way where you live but where I live, the way the banking apps are implemented completely violate MFA. They rely on SMS verification which is absurd since if you're phone is already compromised, no doubt your SMSes are too. There's no true multi-device authentication in place and this has led to a huge number of victims being scammed after their devices get compromised by a phishing attack.

The desktop and phone are both insecure, proper security should not have all your eggs in one basket.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 2 points 40 minutes ago* (last edited 39 minutes ago)

Well, yes. But then again, I would trust my GrapheneOS phone not getting compromised over 3 linux devices. MFA is not some ultimate solutions and it is a pain to use.

Yeah, SIM swaps are a concern too.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

The phone is not insecure because of all eggs on basket.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Which is the point. Why do we need this security when the most virus riden PC can access my banking website.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago

That’s a good point, time to ban banking websites and only allow people with locked-down phones to bank.

[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 10 points 8 hours ago

Yeah but it's "we" as in everyone not "we" as in "Lemmy commenters".

So the network effect will keep the average person on a locked-down phone that can't run anything anti-regime

[–] hkspowers@lemmy.today 6 points 9 hours ago

Yep I absolutely refuse to put any banking apps on my phone. The only thing that has access to my bank is me physically going there or logging into their website via my own computer. Fuck any app that asks for access to my bank account including autopay services thorugh third parties.

The only third party serive I use for payments is paypal and that only goes to my credit card.