this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
112 points (99.1% liked)

chapotraphouse

14085 readers
803 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

...anyways, whatcha having for dinner tonight?

i see now why they married each other. in sickness and in grift...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It's pretty normal I'm my area for people to take photos/videos of deceased loved ones. It's a last memory and often shared with those who can't get to the funeral.

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Really? I've never been to one where people did that thonk

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I have and I think it's really, really weird. But that's kind of an arbitrary thing, how you deal with the remains of a loved one is obviously a pretty socially defined thing.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 4 points 3 days ago

Yes. In my area, people have friends and family all over the place. For practical reasons (age, disability, finances, military service, jobs, kids in school, confinement to nursing facilities or hospitals, etc), this is practical. Elderly in homes wouldn't necessarily have tablets or email accounts for FB, but a visiting friend or family member does.

[–] dragongloss@hexbear.net 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But why make it public? Seems deeply personal and something you'd keep to yourself.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 4 points 3 days ago

People have far-flung family and friends. Maybe someone shares it with a forgotten classmate or family friend. Charlie Kirk was a public figure, so whether genuine or performative, his fanbase wants this.