this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
90 points (98.9% liked)

chapotraphouse

14071 readers
946 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

GO HERE FOR THE NEW INFO ---> https://hexbear.net/post/6121333

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Justice@lemmygrad.ml 78 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Every minute that they keep the name secret (apparently arrested last night per some reports) is a minute the FBI is sweeping all his right wing ties right under the rug

If it's not a groyper or an ambiguously right wing guy with indescribable politics (average American basically) then I don't believe

[–] zipper@hexbear.net 54 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i'm gonna play the devil's advocate here and say that they're genuinely trying to confirm if the guy is actually the shooter. they already fucked up twice so it makes sense that they'd wait before making the name public. although i don't doubt that if he's got non-left ties then they'd be conveniently forgotten like with the trump shooter.

[–] Justice@lemmygrad.ml 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The funny thing is the second "attempted" shooter (who didn't even shoot as far as I remember) was a lib! He's super pro-Ukrainian and pissed that Trump rhetorically wasn't supporting them. Something like that. I don't remember all the shit.

But yeah. I just don't trust any of these guys. It being a far right wing state overall plus the current FBI leadership plus Trump and all the frothing hogs demanding blood. They have every incentive to make shit up and zero to tell inconvenient truths after they spent like two days jacking off to all the mass executions of libs they want to do next week

[–] ClimateStalin@hexbear.net 32 points 2 days ago

Man that dude really should’ve just shut the fuck up. The only evidence he was trying to shoot the president is that he said he was trying to do so.

Brother was walking around south Florida with a gun, that’s not a crime! Until you fired a shot you had plausible deniability. Lie, and shut the fuck up. Repeat after me: “I’m expressing my second amendment right to open carry”

[–] zipper@hexbear.net 14 points 2 days ago

lol weird that they didn't make that fact public. a naive part of me hopes that trump will tell the actual truth about the shooter but that sack of cheeto shit is a compulsive liar. frankly i don't give a fuck about kirk or even the shooter but the fallout that this incident will have on the political climate. goodspeed, my american friends.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm thinking it's more like they're just figuring out how to make someone who obviously isn't the shooter into the shooter.

IMO it's fairly likely they had figured out his identity by yesterday. Not guaranteed, but likely. They didn't release it because they also knew it would be disastrous if it was a groyper and he got away with it, so they decided to withhold the information from public release and find someone who looked close enough.

If they didn't have his identity by yesterday, then they would've come to the same conclusion. They couldn't let it go unpunished so it was time to find some random person who looks close enough (bonus points if it isn't a right winger).

I'm saying this because Trump is apparently saying this person either turned themselves in or got turned in by someone close to them (father?), which makes 0 sense.

[–] zipper@hexbear.net 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm saying this because Trump is apparently saying this person either turned themselves in or got turned in by someone close to them (father?), which makes 0 sense.

luigi got snitched on by a maccas worker, nothing is too out there in this day and age

[–] ClimateStalin@hexbear.net 42 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I’m still not convinced Luigi killed that dude to be quite honest, I kinda still think he’s a patsy.

He looks completely different from the guy in the security footage, who also looks completely different from the guy in the Uber.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Most solid part of the case against Luigi is the goodreads review of the Unabomber manifesto. I find it much easier to believe the second gun and manifesto are planted than to believe he would plan the assassination so well then bungle the escape and still be in the country a couple of days later.

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The thing about the Palantir system is that it's a state space of everyone in America. Meaning you can approach the network with a query and it will find the shortest path from your query to a person.

There's no real evidence or investigation involved, just:

SELECT * FROM people
WHERE
    face LIKE "image.jpg",
    last_location WITHIN_DISTANCE("75 MILES", "<lat>, <lon>"),
    MOOD("United Healthcare") < 0 as uhc_mood
TOP 5
ORDER BY uhc_mood ASC
[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I agree that it's possible the super advanced surveillance systems that Palantir et al have could've been used to find him and Luigi did do it, but then that goes into the parallel construction theory, that the evidence was still planted to solidify a case (especially when the evidence actually utilized to find the subject is inadmissible for some reason).

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not saying that they got the right guy, I'm saying that the way they use these AI systems to find patsys makes it very believable since the immediately available information will make them look guilty. You then just plant extra evidence until it's "undeniable".

Same way chatGPT is always plausibly correct at first glance.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago

Right, that's actually really smart. The Oswald finder.

[–] zipper@hexbear.net 22 points 2 days ago

i haven't been too invested in his case, but i agree that the CCTV footage guy and luigi don't look alike. who knows though.

[–] Crucible@hexbear.net 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I agree and I'm really curious if his legal defense is going to be The Shaggy Defense: 'that wasn't me' 'cause it seems like everyone including news media started entirely assuming his guilt long before any evidence was presented by people other than the pigs who could completely make it up

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 17 points 2 days ago

I remember noting how horrible the journalistic malpractice was when Luigi was arrested and they were constantly using "the suspect" instead of "the shooter" or "the perpetrator." Like, "the suspect shot at Thompson" kinds of sentences were so common when Luigi got taken into custody.

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago

Same, I am absolutely unconvinced

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

luigi got snitched on by a maccas worker, nothing is too out there in this day and age

That's more believable (and I still think it was parallel construction IF it was Luigi) than the possibility that this shooter went home to his scrupulous dad after the most high profile assassination in American politics in quite a few years, and decided to comply with whoever was turning him in.

[–] zipper@hexbear.net 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

fair point, now that i think about it this seems a bit fantastical. a guy who planned out everything to a T all of a sudden caves to his conscience out of the goodness of his heart because his dad told him to? yeah, something is wrong.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's very likely a groyper! These are the most nihilistic scumbags in the world, why would he suddenly face a bout of contrition? Did he see the face of Jesus on his morning toast or what?

[–] zipper@hexbear.net 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

maybe joseph smith came to him in a vision and told him that he'd get a pass to drink coffee if he turns himself in

[–] Justice@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe even gasp a Dr. Pepper?

The non-caffeine Mormons are crazy as fuck. I worked with one a long time ago. He was always super chipper and overall a "nice guy." But there's something so unsettling about them. Every practicing Mormon I've ever met there's just something off.

I saw that same guy at the gym one time at one of the bench presses. He didn't have headphones on or anything. Still in his work clothes (blue collar stuff. Covered in oil and dirt). He just loads three plates on the bar, slides under, reps that shit, then sits there resting and does it again. No music. No phone between sets. Just like nodding to himself. Wild shit.

[–] zipper@hexbear.net 14 points 2 days ago

they're essentially just christian fundies on steroids. having fun and whimsy isn't allowed so they have to compensate by looking for any and all loopholes that they can use to do normal people shit. at least they're universalists, but their heaven is fucking segregated too lmfao the joke writes itself.