this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
1088 points (98.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

37156 readers
316 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 205 points 2 days ago (9 children)

I 100% assume that the McDonald's employee who called on him is fake in some way, and they tracked him down through some kind of spy apparatus shit and just don't want to give away their methods.

I have no evidence and I don't really know how these things work, it just seems way way more plausible to me.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 127 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They didn't track him down because he wasn't the shooter.

[–] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That could be. I'm still vouching for the "conspiracy" that Luigi actually didn't do anything but was selected as a lookalike scapegoat. The similar looks is what prompted the McDonald employee to call, and they incompetently called the police instead of the tip line.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I haven't heard that his defense team is trying to claim that... I feel like if that was reality they would have. Maybe not, but I feel it.

[–] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Proving Luigi wasn't there somehow would be their job in court. Considering he was arrested, there may not be a clearly provable alibi like in To Kill A Mockingbird.

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What would the defense say? "That wasn't him, just someone who looks similar."
They already claim that by pleading innocent at the start.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago

Not really... "not guilty" can mean, he didn't do it, or else he was temporarily insane because he was in pain from his medical condition, or even Ed Snowden's "yeah I did it and it was illegal but at the end of the day I was right to do it and I think I can convince a jury of that." Or just the OJ Simpson "let's talk about something else for a while and change the subject" defense. It could be a lot of things.

But I do get it that that might be their defense and they're just not saying anything about it because they're waiting for the trial to lay out anything at all about it.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well thats the thing. Nobody in the history of court has plead innocent. Thats not a thing. You can plead guilty, no contest, or not guilty.

And "not guilty" isn't the same as "innocent"

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

I'm sorry I don't know all the arcane incantations of your court system of the top of my head.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A good defense team doesn't go around screaming what their defense strategy is going to be. Just because they aren't telling YOU, doesn't mean they have a bad defense strategy. They drop their bombs when the time is right.

Yeah. Sometimes for high-profile cases, lawyers have a habit of giving press conferences and things, but that's kind of an exception to the norm and not necessarily a good idea I think.

[–] LilDumpy@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Ok, I'll accept this conspiracy theory and add to it:

It was actually the surveillance software in the AI drive through.

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Welcome to McDonalds
Would you like to report any serious crimes today?

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hi, I'm a near ghost that has evaded capture against all odds, would you mind holding my bag o' incriminating evidence while I order some nuggets?

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

President Not-Dead is excited about nuggies in his Huggies

[–] violetsoftness@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

he was inside the mcdonald's though he didn't use the drive thru

i agree that it's all parallel construction from some illegal surveillance though

[–] LilDumpy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

That's what they WANT you to think.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The method that totally wouldn’t have been used was to have a foreign ally in Five Eyes track all cell phones and correlate the information with security cameras. Then they share the intelligence with the US. Technically on the edge of legal but they know the shit storm if americans generally knew how surveilled they are. We literally would hand them all our related files, ask them to spot suspects, and hand us back the answer. The soaking version of surveillance.

Part of the point of the Snowden leaks was that they don't completely give a shit about those limitations. I'm sure the details vary in various parts of the apparatus, but as I understand it they don't even really bother with the fig leaf anymore (even as of that pretty long ago time at this point).

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago

It's like the police always saying that they find a "passport" in the truck after some terrorist attack. They have inside informers and they don't want to disclose them.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Even if the tip was useful they can just claim to wasn't and just not pay it out. Not like there's an oversize process for it. Once they have the guy they can find the trail with whatever data they have and say they did it without the tip.

[–] jwmgregory@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago

this isn’t a conspiracy theory to the people saying it is. these systems are well attested to exist already. predictive policing is already being used. fucking watch yourselves. big brother sees all.

[–] Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Most of the world is being spied in with AI cameras, streets, Walmart, etc. most likely even McDonald’s cameras.