this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
94 points (95.2% liked)

Linux

58047 readers
204 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Was surprised no one bothered to post this give how big of a reaction this story got.

Wanted to post the update and correction cause that deserves to be seen just as much. This seems like a reasonable, thoughtful handling of the issue.

I still don't really wanna use Ubuntu though 😅

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Naich@lemmings.world 7 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I don't get the hate for Ubuntu. It's easy to use, and there is nothing nasty you are forced to use, e.g. you can choose how much non-foss stuff you want to install, analytics are opt-in, etc.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago

Snaps can go to hell

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

my only real problem is snaps. and how often they seem to come up with community-hurting stuff like snaps.

like when they put amazon ads in ubuntu. i'm pretty sure they were sending your searches to amazon at some point. or when they decided to fork gnome 3 instead of helping the team fix it properly.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 5 hours ago

I use an unbuntu respin that is pretty close to stock ubuntu.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 18 points 1 day ago

Snaps made me personally stop using Ubuntu.

I just went back to Debian and I'm happy.

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The initial thing that gave me the ick was when Amazon was integrated into their search for money.

Unity is also pretty bad. Laggy, weird, and it just isn't cool looking

I run kubuntu and Ubuntu server on a couple of my machines, so I am not a total hater, but lately I've been moving to other distros.

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One thing I really miss from Unity is the efficient use of the top bar doubling as a title bar for full screen windows. I wish modern DEs would do this.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago

i'm pretty sure KDE can still do this

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think they've had a number of controversies over the years, but I think the big frustration people have at the moment is really just that snaps are kind of a crummy thing in several respects, don't have an open source backend, and often don't work as well as flatpaks (to my understanding)

The increasing commitment to going down that path is a big turn off for many, and disqualifying for some.

That being said, I have used and been happy with Ubuntu in the past. I think some of the dislike is just motivated by "thing popular", especially since it's so popular with folks new to linux who are still figuring things out

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just here to add that, yes, Snaps are very broken. Do not use them if you value your time or well-being.

The annoying thing is that Canonical dishonestly co-opts your apt invocations for snap installations, so you're likely to waste hours of your life trying to figure out why the thing you installed doesn't work or takes forever to launch randomly. And they keep Snapifying more of their distro, so even things like GNOME packages are only available as Snaps.

[–] clb92@feddit.dk 4 points 1 day ago

Snaps are basically the only reason I don't use Ubuntu.

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Thats kinda worse even than I thought :/

Thank you for sharing additional perspective I appreciate it!

[–] vhstape@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Honestly, I don’t think Snaps are so bad. Canonical’s top market is enterprise, and Snaps are ideal for deploying applications in these environments. If you’re an end-user, you can literally just uninstall the runtime

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Snaps are bad for two reasons:

  1. The backend is proprietary & the client doesn't support other backends without modifying the source code
  2. For some packages, doing apt install installs the Snap instead

There's no good reason for either. Canonical is simply setting things up so they can squeeze money out of their users by enshittifying over time.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

they're also great for software bom's