this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2025
75 points (89.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

43584 readers
1065 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

BTW, If one was already profoundly hypothermic, would it be unwise to fart?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 2 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Exactly, beside one techniallity:

The process of fart mixing into ambient air generates heat.

No, it does not generate heat. It carries a portion of heat from the body and transports it into the ambient air in the room. Almost simultaneously, an equivalent amount of air leaves the room to the outside. The increased heat of the air yields into an increased temperature in the room.

[–] dgdft@lemmy.world 15 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

The act of mixing fart into air is an exothermic process that does in fact explicitly generate heat. You can read up here if curious: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enthalpy_change_of_solution

Granted, it’s not intuitive without getting deep into the weeds of thermodynamics, but when different molecules that are attracted to one another get mixed, that combined form is a state with lower chemical potential energy than the original substances would have if left separate. I.e. you’d need to invest energy to break up the intermolecular attractions if you wanted to re-separate the molecules. The potential energy “lost” in the process of mixing is extruded in the form of heat.

I have a degree in physics and work in biomed R&D. I am a qualified fart scientist — this is what I live for.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

But isn’t there some contribution from the delta in pressure?

[–] dgdft@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Yeah, you’re right — there would be some cooling from pressure release.

I might need to do some math tonight.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Qualifies mixing of gases as dissolution?

The energy change can be regarded as being made up of three parts: the endothermic breaking of bonds within the solute and within the solvent, and the formation of attractions between the solute and the solvent.

Does not sound like mixing of gases. No bonds are broken. No bonds are formed. Just (almost) free molecules moving around.

As my profession is solid mechanics, mixing of fluids is not my field of expertise.

[–] dgdft@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

In a nutshell, the bonds in question are intermolecular forces, not bonds between atoms within a molecule.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] dgdft@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Care to elaborate on your stance?

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

We are talking about mixing of gases, not the solution of a liquid in a gas or a solid in a liquid.

Here, no bonding forces are broken as there are almost none active. Air as a mixture of gases at low pressure is, at least like I have learned in thermodynamics, treated as if its different components don't interact with each other. For each component, the state equation is evaluated individually using its partial pressure.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Each molecule is on its own. There is nothing to dissolve. No bonds to break.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Of course. Otherwise this would qualify as a chemical reaction.

I'd totally get it, if were taking about lets say vaporising of perfume or fuel. There, the bonding forces between the molecules of the liquid (van der Waals, H-bridges) are released, and thus stored energy is set free.

[–] dgdft@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, that’s fair.

I was focused on the marginal effect no matter how small, but you’re right that heat of solvation for gases is minuscule. I’m won over on the idea that it would be outweighed by cooling effect of gas expansion from fart decompression.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I’m won over on the idea that it would be outweighed by cooling effect of gas expansion from fart decompression.

Did you already find information on how much pressure a colon can sustain or maintain?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

No no, dissolution does generate (sometimes negative) heat. It's called heat of solvation and it exists because when something dissolves it breaks solute-solute bonds, requiring energy, but then forms solute-solvent bonds, releasing energy. This difference can either result in the solution becoming hotter or colder than its components.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is not happening here. There is no solution, everything is a gas.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah solutions can have any phase of solute and any phase of solvent. The most common example of a solution of gases is the air, so yeah.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No. Gas in gas can not be a solution. The solvent must be a solid or liquid.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Okay this is apparently one of those things where you'll get different answers depending on who you ask (even different Wikipedia articles give different answers), but this is a matter of semantics. No matter what you call it, mixing on a molecular level will result in the release or absorption of (in the case of gases a very small amount of) heat.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

The edge cases, so mixing very polar with very nonpolar gases has deviations in enthalpy. Very tiny, but they exist.

Mixing inert species like nitrogen, CH4 or oxygen (anything human, fart or air related) does not result in a change in enthalpy. All it does is increase entropy. They are essentially ideal gases under these conditions, nothing happens.

Which Wikipedia article? Please name them so they can be corrected.

Heat does not get absorbed. Semantics or not, these words have well defined meanings.

[–] chocrates@piefed.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Is it any different from hot air exhaled from your lungs?

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Not much, except the pressure involved is different. Breathing takes place at almost ambient pressure, fatting involves larger pressure release. Thus, while breathing is an almost isochronic process, for the air you exhale, no air will leave the room, but flatus expands when released to the environment.
Also flatus contains more methane, carbon oxides and fancy molecules than the air we exhale usually does, which contains more water than flatus.