Politics

10788 readers

98 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Socialism

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

circularfish@beehaw.org

knokelmaat@beehaw.org

remington@beehaw.org

California’s governor has become an anti-Trump comedian. It’s 2017 all over again. (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 3 days ago by PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social to c/politics@beehaw.org

50 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No, he made it into the news because he's doing all this attention grabbing shit. And then some geniuses sprung the gotcha of "Aha! He is a high-profile Democrat, therefore nothing he does counts, because he's just doing it because he wants to be president!" And then they sat back with a satisfied smile.

The article isn't talking him up as a candidate. I'm not talking him up as a candidate. He's not in the news because he's a candidate for the election that's going to happen in three and a half years. Are you now shifting your stance from "now that he's being talked up as a candidate" to something different? Or still claiming he's being talked up as a candidate for the election and that's why we have to "respond" with this sort of disclaimer? I mean, it's fine, I actually was as you noted the person who posted this article which is slapping a disclaimer on what he is doing. But IDK where you got the idea that all of a sudden now he's being talked up as a candidate.

[–] spit_evil_olive_tips@beehaw.org 4 points 2 days ago

IDK where you got the idea that all of a sudden now he’s being talked up as a candidate.

it's not all of a sudden. it's been obvious for years that the presidency is the goal he's working towards. don't confuse "I only started paying attention recently" with "this only started recently".

from his wikipedia:

Many journalists and political analysts have mentioned Newsom as a presidential hopeful. According to a June 2023 poll by NewsNation, 22% of California voters wanted Newsom to enter the 2024 presidential election. In May 2023, Schwarzenegger said it was a "no-brainer" that Newsom would someday run for president. An April 2023 article published in The Hill by journalist Sharon Udasin also discussed the inevitability of a Newsom presidential run. In September 2022, Newsom said that he would not run for president in 2024, citing his "vulnerable" 2021 recall. After his 2022 reelection, he informed White House staff that he would not challenge President Biden in the Democratic primaries; he endorsed Biden's reelection campaign on April 25, 2023.

...

In anticipation of a potential 2028 presidential campaign, Newsom has adjusted his political approach to appeal to a broader electorate. A key shift in his strategy has been his engagement with conservative voices, including hosting MAGA figures like Charlie Kirk and Steve Bannon on his podcast, This is Gavin Newsom. While this tactic has received a fair amount of criticism from his own supporters, Newsom has also been praised by figures on the left for his hawkish response to the Trump administration's actions regarding gerrymandering, with his widely publicized Election Rigging Response Act in August 2025 seen by many commentators as a soft launch of a presidential run.

he's savvy enough to play the long game. running in 2020 would have been seen as premature, because he only started as governor in Jan 2019. didn't want to rock the boat in 2024 by challenging Biden or Harris. he's term-limited as CA governor which means he can't run for re-election in 2026. he is absolutely 1000% going to run in 2028.

and yeah he hasn't formally announced yet, but no one has at this point in the cycle. like, JD Vance hasn't either even though as VP of a theoretically-term-limited president he's obviously going to be in the running too.