this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
164 points (98.8% liked)

Ukraine

10637 readers
371 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

Matrix Space


Community Rules

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³ Defense Aid πŸ’₯


πŸ’³ Humanitarian Aid βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ


πŸͺ– Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


See also:

!nafo@lemm.ee

!combatvideos@SJW


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah I was hoping for something more James Bond. Like launching electrical probes like a tazer, or spinning blades or something. But this works too.

Now I wonder how intentional it was. If it had lost radio contact, that seems like somewhat dangerous default behavior.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

naval ordinance are a military's most sacred secrets. from a military prerspective the consequences of a drone like this falling into enemy hands likely necessitates the "fail to the safe position" of "if we can't reach a drone, better to scuttle it than risk it falling into enemy hands"

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I guess it would be pretty straightforward to to put a detonation timer kill switch on loss of contact. Say something like 30-60 minutes after loss of contact the drone blows up.

As well as the military secrecy aspect, they don't want these drones washing up on the shore where some civilians could accidentally set them off.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Plus an explosion near where you know it was is better than an explosion where you don't know. Thousands of naval mines ended up on beaches far flung where they were laid and moreover sometimes decades after the war.

Wouldn’t want to be QA on that project.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Maybe it has a sort of antihandling device just for this purpose

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Maybe it didn't even lose contact.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wouldn't be a surprise to avoid capture of tech, but maybe it was just an accident due to damage. A small explosion underwater (lithium batteries and fuel?) can be deadly enough. Maybe they're designed to self destruct but this one failed until it got handled (wouldn't you want it to destruct as soon as certain variables were exceeded?)

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 5 points 1 week ago

ukrainian drones already washed out on shore once when musk shut off starlink during one of first crimea raids, i'm sure they account for loss of signal now

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can see something like if it rolls over and can't right itself would be good reason to self detonate. Or maybe if it reaches a certain altitude

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 4 points 1 week ago

rolls over, gets taken out of the water, loses connection for some long time, gps indicates that it's on land, all of these suggest future reverse engineering and can be prevented easily