this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
1074 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

72868 readers
2079 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 475 points 1 week ago (18 children)

I can't believe people still use Twitter.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 6 days ago

2 foreign parties have interest in keeping it up. MSB and putin.

[–] mienshao@lemmy.world 208 points 1 week ago (9 children)

I think this every single time I see news about that website. Like what the fuck is possibly on there that justifies using that piece of shit platform? Insanity.

[–] mal3oon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Like what the fuck is possibly on there that justifies using that piece of shit platform?

Tech news. Fast tech news. It's well centralized. Unfortunately nothing comes close (not reddit, nor HN, nor lemmy).

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago

There's just a lot less activity on the alternatives. Especially if you're trying to follow niche interests.

Obviously, I left, but I get how barren it can feel when the latest post about a hobby of yours is 3 days old, instead of 3 minutes.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Like what the fuck is possibly on there that justifies using that piece of shit platform?

People. Lots of people. Including Doctor Cory Doctorow and Molly White.

[–] a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

We were talking about Xitter, not Mastodon...

[–] a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

and we are talking about reasons why people are still there - those two aren't one, because you can read their posts somewhere else too. Except if you meant that people are still there because those two are still there.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You're missing the point. Ask yourself why those people are still there.

[–] tankfox@midwest.social 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Hey, mastodon isn't that bad! When bluesky runs out of funny money and has to enshittify it'll be the one left standing!

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Once again, not talking about Mastodon

[–] a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It seems that multiple people don't get what you are trying to say, and i would really like to know. if you have the time, could you elaborate?

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I honestly don't know how to be more clear. It's called a social graph. The most important thing about a social network, above everything else (for normies), is having lots of users. Cory and Molly both know and understand that if they left Xitter, they would lose access to a substantial amount of their audience, so they both stay, despite being some of the platform's harshest critics and the biggest supporters of it's alternatives. That's the answer to the question "why would anyone use it?". The social graph.

[–] a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

but the only way to break through this is to change the platform. Since both of them already keep their posts equal on both sites, it makes switching easier for everyone; removing their content from Xitter would be an incentive for others to switch.

The ideal way would be to try and band together a large amount of "regular posters" and completely switch on an agreed date together; that would have a pull effect for others to do the same.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago

I wasn't trying to make any sort of argument why they should be doing that, only why they are.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 62 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This sketch was about Facebook but it's also relevant to Twitter

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 35 points 1 week ago

Actually more relevant now, considering the ending

"Go to the site where Nazi's scream at you". It's talking about moving from facebook to twitter.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago

Well the punchline to that sketch is "instead of FB, just do what I do: Go to the site where nazis scream at you!" just might be that twitter reference you said was missing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ter_maxima@jlai.lu 27 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Non-fediverse social media is designed to be addictive because that's how the people running it make money.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] mhague@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

You can mimic the feel of Twitter by taking reddit threads and cutting them at the most popular reply (Reddit already does this), and then reversing the order. Now the "best" content is front and center and the conversation / context is in the background. Users don't have to go through the tediousness of a discussion before experiencing the sheer joy of a witty response. The emotions come faster and more consistently.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 98 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I dont really care that the average person still uses twitter... What's INFURIATING is that gov't agencies are still using that shit. Why are important pieces of information still being shared on twitter??

[–] don@lemmy.ca 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Secretary of Defense coordinated military operations on Signal, accidentally included a reporter to the group chat (who later spilled the tea on the whole thing), and in that chat claimed they were "clean" on their opsec.

That's what republicans do. They're dumber than a bag of wet bags.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

they would never do such a thing. not after calling out hillary clinton for using private email servers.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

Bush used private email servers before her. The trump admin used private email servers after the scandal. I didn't think ANYONE in the government should be, but Republicans have always accused others of what they were doing

[–] wetsoggybread@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My friend works for a local town that has a presence on fb, twitter, and inatgarm. The main reason he says they haven't moved to platforms like blsky is because as a government entity they are required to be able to archive all online communications for situations like a Right-to-know request but run into the issue that these small platforms aren't supported by the archiving software so they can't move away completely until then. Fun fact: 1st amendment prevents the government pages from removing or hiding comments you leave on their posta

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Would that stop them from duplicating the information on other platforms?

[–] wetsoggybread@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It does if it can't be archived, any official posts must be available for a right to know request so they could post on Facebook or twitter but other sites that don't have a way to archive or a third party to archive they can't make official posts

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

But my question is, does it not count as being archived if it's exactly the same message that's posted to another platform that is archived?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago (9 children)

I keep getting arguments from peoplee about this, even on Bluesky.

Apparently it's too much to expect people to inconvenience themselves and not follow their favorite musicians or whatever.

If the vast majority of people can't be assed to take the absolutely easiest step possible to fight (or avoid supporting) fascists/Nazis, then we really are fucked.

Same thing with how people could very, very easily choose just NOT to buy another Nazicar. Yet 90% if Americans still bought one last month as a year earlier. It's just about the smallest sacrifice I can think of - just buying a DIFFERENT car that you might not like quite as much.

And I think the fact that we are where we are right now also confirms the problem.

[–] DJDarren@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Perhaps it's because I'm old, but I kinda hit a wall a few years back where I stopped giving a shit about what famous people had to say on the internet. So on that basis, the move from Twitter to Mastodon was easy for me. Less easy was leaving behind people who I liked, but life is change, and we leave people behind all the time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Lanusensei87@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People just don't want to quit because the alternatives aren't populated enough.... Which is caused by people not leaving. Twitter is to many a necessity for their business, just like many softwares provided by scum companies.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

bluesky is populated "enough".

[–] Lanusensei87@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Not if you want to make a living of it. People that do commissions tell me this. It's just what it is.

[–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I do think that bluesky has a ton of momentum right now and is a viable alternative. But the thing about microblogging sites is that if the specific people you want to follow aren't on them, there's not really a substitute. I know I've heard people say that, for example, a lot of japanese game developers are still primarily on twitter (I've never been a twitter/bsky enjoyer so I can't speak to it personally).

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

We can all go entire books at this point with the things we can't believe...

This timeline is fucking insane, and twice as depressing as anything I thought I'd ever live through.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

people are always resistant to changing habits

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I feel like the common use cases are:

  1. you’re MAGA nut
  2. you’re not a MAGA nut, but you want to see what the loonies are talking about
  3. You’re a marketer or influencer and you know MAGA nuts also buy shit
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)