this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
126 points (98.5% liked)
United States | News & Politics
2900 readers
435 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is ridiculous. Checks and balances are in the Constitution. A state law can't just exclude itself from judicial review any more than a mayoral edict can.
The constitution is irrelevant if it’s not enforced
Not actually true. Judicial review is not in the constitution. It has been interpreted as being implied by the constitution, but not as absolute. My understanding is that the US Congress has the right to exclude things from judicial review. I've never heard consideration of doing it at the state legislature level though. It's definitely ballsy.
Okay but who's enforcing it?
Are they in the Texas state constitution specifically? Or just the federal? Because these people don't care about the Feds unless it benefits them to do so. And, how do you plan to challenge it? In the courts?
Unless there's enforcement, courts mean nothing. If the cops want it to be a law, it's a law, no matter how much anyone says otherwise. And if the legislature has the cops on their side, the courts don't matter.
Then democracy is well and truly dead.