this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
622 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

69867 readers
2732 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There is a major difference between running a vm on your desktop and orchestrating a fleet of highly available virtual machines. Just one example might be vmotion. You can move a virtual machine from one physical host to another in real time with 0 interruption to services running on that host.

That’s some incredible stuff. Now days you can use things like XCP-ng to do the same but VMware was ahead of the pack for a decade.

They started dying when they were squeezed between cloud hyper scalars and the cheaper alternative hypervisors that finally had caught up.

Then the corpse was bought by Broadcom who is currently trying to milk it before the body completely rots.

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So, it seems that companies' infrastructure was already entrenched with VMware, and now Broadcom is trying to leverage the fact that VMware is already being used to squeeze more money out of its acquisition?

[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago
[–] Hexarei@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can do live migration like that with qemu, I do it all the time with Proxmox, which uses qemu under the hood.

[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You’re not wrong in 2025. But VMware was able do it in 2003.

[–] Hexarei@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True. Your response just seemed to imply that the two aren't comparable in 2025, and they absolutely are.

[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

No problem. I just thought I had covered that when I said:

That’s some incredible stuff. Now days you can use things like XCP-ng to do the same but VMware was ahead of the pack for a decade.

They started dying when they were squeezed between cloud hyper scalars and the cheaper alternative hypervisors that finally had caught up.

This being said I don’t think even in 2025 proxmox and things like vsphere are comparable. XCP-ng I do think is though. It’s open source and matches features.