this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
119 points (69.9% liked)

Linux

54005 readers
1198 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
119
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) by doomsdayrs@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
 

Like y'all keep posting about it, praising it, giving it free advertisement, and what not.

But the dev is a fascist, the discord server is a fascist bar, and the project thus is fascist.

I've met people who were harassed, I browsed through now deleted messages of Vaxry using slurrs and more.

So I wonder is if the people who post constantly about it know and are complicit, or just don't know and would act otherwise?

It gets tiring to see the project be given "fame" when I know the roots of the plants are founded in toxicity & abuse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bloup@lemmy.sdf.org 73 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

I think it’s really funny how in proprietary software, if you download stuff without asking, you’re presumed to have economically harmed a business. But in free and open source software, if you download stuff without asking, you’re presumed to have economically benefited the random individual that made the project.

[–] embed_me@programming.dev 1 points 10 hours ago

It's because proprietary software actually has value

(jk, I'm one of us)

[–] Luffy879@lemmy.ml 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

If you like hyprland, use it. Just dont prompte it. Dont talk about it. Dont even mention it

[–] liberatedGuy@lemmy.ml 12 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Why? We like something. We share it. You may ignore it.

[–] Ildsaye@hexbear.net 1 points 1 hour ago

Attention, fame, encouragement, and engagement are also currency, and aiding fascists is fascism. We all deserve to live in a world where fascists don't feel safe openly declaring themselves.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 4 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Because promoting hyprland is morally wrong? Its pretty simple

[–] liberatedGuy@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

My morals come from my religion and not from some arbitrary standards set by a Western supremacist, who thinks their culture is superior to everyone else and the rest of the world is "primitive". Promoting a tool by itself is not morally wrong. It seems like some people have a very low opinion about other people. They think that others will not be able to differentiate between a tool and the morals of its makers. I am sorry that I have a much higher opinion about adults.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 1 points 4 hours ago

Who is the Western supremacist in this scenario and what relationship do they have to morality? Kinda makes or breaks your whole argument

[–] Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

How much wrong does a person have to do for you to consider it morally wrong to promote the things they make?

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Why is it wrong to promote the things a shitty person makes?

It's FOSS, so using it doesn't give them money. On the other hand, a user might voluntarily donate if they're unaware.

One might claim they're being given a platform in the community by people promoting their product, but on the other hand I hear more loudly that they're toxic, fascist and banned from various places.

Anything else to add?

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 4 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I don't have a lot that I would add, but I would just assert that the "user might donate if they're unaware" is a big enough reason on its own. Even if you promote it alongside a caveat mentioning the moral shortcomings, the people who start using it because of your promotion might also promote it, but there's no guarantee they'll keep the caveat (in fact I'd consider it likely that people who will use the product despite the caveat are exceptionally likely to neglect to mention anything in their promotion).

And to your second point I'd say that its pretty indisputable that they are being given a platform, as evidenced by the platform they have. It is a platform that is, as you mention, not subscribed to by a lot of people with a moral backbone, but it is significant.

If I had to give a one-liner for why it is bad to promote the things a shitty person makes, I'd say "its a bit of a Nazi bar thing".

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

And in addition to that: It's also kind of a big thing that they get an audience. The more people use the projects, the bigger the audience. They'll get a Discord and people will join because of the project, people will start reading their blog because of the attention via the software... People will maintain and package their software, or use it, or contribute to it... Directly resulting in interactions with the group which develops a project. That's a direct consequence of the project getting attention. And "promoting" is a way to draw attention.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Those are both great points, thanks for explaining.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 1 points 7 hours ago

No worries I'm glad we could discuss it in a way that was helpful!