this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
63 points (88.9% liked)

Space

9384 readers
140 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

๐Ÿ”ญ Science

๐Ÿš€ Engineering

๐ŸŒŒ Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

NASA increased the chances of asteroid 2024 YR4 hitting Earth to 1 in 32, or 3.1%, on Tuesday, but they're now back down to 1 in 67, or 1.5%.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] artificialfish@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I guess i didnโ€™t realize the practicalities of guessing an objects mass location and momentum. I thought we knew most of the stuff in our solar system to pinpoint accuracy already. Youโ€™d think in-solar-system weโ€™d have some kind of magic tech able to pinpoint stuff we can see in a telescope (radio, laser, idk). A telescope in mars orbit vs a telescope in solar orbit vs a telescope in earth orbit could get you position and velocity very accurately id think.

[โ€“] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's a shame you're being downvoted for genuine questions.

I thought we knew most of the stuff in our solar system to pinpoint accuracy already.

We know where all the big rocks are. Those smaller than a few hundred meters are much harder to spot.

A telescope in mars orbit vs a telescope in solar orbit vs a telescope in earth orbit could get you position and velocity very accurately id think.

It definitely could, but we don't really have astrometry telescopes beyond earth orbit. I can't wait until launch costs get low enough for us to yeet Hubble-class or Arecibo-class telescopes all over the solar system, and maybe even do interferometry between them.

[โ€“] artificialfish@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks. Oh is this not โ€œbigโ€? Do we at least have the dinosaur killers mapped out ๐Ÿคž

[โ€“] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Oh is this not โ€œbigโ€?

Not compared to the dinosaur killer. Chicxulub was around 10 kilometers wide, while 2024 YR4 is estimated to be ~100 meters wide. A hundred-fold increase in linear size roughly corresponds to million-fold increases in volume, mass, and energy. 2024 YR4 could wipe out a city, but nothing close to the effects of Chicxulub.

Do we at least have the dinosaur killers mapped out ๐Ÿคž

Yeah, I think we've catalogued those pretty extensively, and pinned down their orbits well enough to conclude that none of them pose a significant threat in the next century or so.