this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
143 points (99.3% liked)

chapotraphouse

13669 readers
882 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Elon, aka Office of Personnel Management, aka S.H.I.T.H.E.A.D.:

We encourage you to find a job in the private sector as soon as you would like to do so. The way to greater American prosperity is encouraging people to move from lower productivity jobs in the public sector to higher productivity jobs in the private sector.

Damn dude, this is so awesome, I’ve literally never been tied to this fuck through even consumption and now I have him pulling on my chains, at the best possible time cursed-woog

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lussy@hexbear.net 46 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Holy fuck lmao

Well, I just received an email from the agency’s undersecretary:

In furtherance of President Trump’s EO, “Defending Women”, agency has updated its style guide to revise the email signature block and remove the use of personal pronouns.

What absolute fuckery

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 5 points 4 hours ago

Time to start misgendering every male in the department on purpose.

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 24 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So the style guide will also be updated to require everyone to use gender neutral pronouns in written correspondence? anakin-padme-2

[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 10 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

No pronouns at all, everyone must use full names at all times. If sending out a mass email, you must include the name of every single person who will be receiving in the text body.

[–] inTheShadowOf@hexbear.net 28 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

And what if a cis woman wants to put she/her in (cw: pronoun 😱) her email signature??

This defending women thing really seems to be restricting women.

[–] jack@hexbear.net 37 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

This defending women thing really seems to be restricting women.

astronaut-1

[–] M68040@hexbear.net 7 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Honestly if they make this a choice between trans people and cis women I’m choosing trans people

[–] jack@hexbear.net 31 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

That's not how it actually works though. It is always simultaneously an attack on both trans people and cis women. Different segments of the same struggle against the same oppressors.

[–] JustSo@hexbear.net 10 points 3 hours ago

Factual and correct. Transphobia is just another face of misogyny and patriarchy is the unjust hierarchy that predates even the kings/lords/serfs and the advent of capital.

[–] Sulvor@hexbear.net 21 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] M68040@hexbear.net 10 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Yeah, I just...don't know how to not let them set the terms of discourse at this point. I hate them and I hate that they put people in these situations, but...Shit's cooked.

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 11 points 6 hours ago

Por que no los dos