this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
143 points (99.3% liked)
chapotraphouse
13669 readers
863 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Wait til yer agency sends out an email saying we fully support the presidents EO on defending women from those stinky trans people. I think today's the deadline on that one
Holy fuck lmao
Well, I just received an email from the agency’s undersecretary:
In furtherance of President Trump’s EO, “Defending Women”, agency has updated its style guide to revise the email signature block and remove the use of personal pronouns.
What absolute fuckery
Time to start misgendering every male in the department on purpose.
So the style guide will also be updated to require everyone to use gender neutral pronouns in written correspondence?
No pronouns at all, everyone must use full names at all times. If sending out a mass email, you must include the name of every single person who will be receiving in the text body.
And what if a cis woman wants to put she/her in (cw: pronoun 😱) her email signature??
This defending women thing really seems to be restricting women.
Honestly if they make this a choice between trans people and cis women I’m choosing trans people
That's not how it actually works though. It is always simultaneously an attack on both trans people and cis women. Different segments of the same struggle against the same oppressors.
Factual and correct. Transphobia is just another face of misogyny and patriarchy is the unjust hierarchy that predates even the kings/lords/serfs and the advent of capital.
False dichotomy
Yeah, I just...don't know how to not let them set the terms of discourse at this point. I hate them and I hate that they put people in these situations, but...Shit's cooked.
Por que no los dos