this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
567 points (97.2% liked)

196

16813 readers
2219 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
567
rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 18 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) by hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

Guys, at this rate I don't think the revolution's going to happen anytime soon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 49 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Someone somewhere would because UBI is the capitalist techbro idea of a social safety net; it's a band-aid that doesn't address the underlying problems in a similar way to how the ACA helps but in reality is a very center-right idea that doesn't address the underlying hypercapitalist healthcare system.

[–] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 60 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Well there yah go, we didn’t even need to introduce it and it’s already not left enough.

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It was cooked up by Milton Friedman, one of the grandfathers of American free market libertarianism.

The whole impetus of UBI was to eliminate traditional social services because, it is argued, there's no way that a government institution could be as efficient or effective as a free market.

And make no mistake, even modern proponents of UBI such as Andrew Yang propose funding it by hollowing out existing social services.

Like, yeah, UBI is better than having literally no social support at all, but the fact that its seen as this ultra-leftist idea, to the point that we apparently can't even conceive of how it could possibly "not be left enough", is an indication of how far right mainstream politics has shifted.

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 14 hours ago