this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
422 points (92.5% liked)

Memes

46031 readers
1589 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 39 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (6 children)

Unpopular opinion:

Alienating liberals doesn't create more leftists, it only causes people to be dismissive of the term and dig in their heels.
Insulting them rather than educating them does nothing but divide anyone left of center and after the last election I think it's abundantly clear that we need to be unified rather than divided.
No one is going to argue that left leaning candidates aren't far from perfect, but they're a hell of a lot better than the far-right fascists were about to have in power in less than 2 weeks.
Yes, I agree modern liberals are too centrist and ineffective but at the end of the day they're light-years ahead of the far right, and I'd rather be agitated about having another centrist administration than alarmed and outraged at the onset of fascism.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 hours ago

I don't think they really are "light years ahead of the right". Most of the difference as far as I can tell is in how they talk-- not what they do. Liberals fundamentally just believe in the status quo. MLK Jr saw it the same way when he described " the white moderate" as the greatest obstacle to change.

I'm definitely willing to engage liberals (and even conservatives) in honest conversation when I feel the context warrants the effort. Lemmy rarely seems to qualify.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

last election I think it’s abundantly clear that we need to be unified rather than divided.

Who's "we"? Liberals are not on the left and are ideological enemies of the left: you can't be unified with people who fundamentally oppose you.

Also, which election? Oh right, you're one of the those American liberals who think foreigners are fictional characters. That explains why you think leftists would want to ally with the people committing genocide against these "fictional characters"

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world -1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

what is the benefit of writing a response with such a hostile tone?

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

What's the benefit of mollycoddleing genocide apologists like Chainweasel?

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

thats not an unpopular opinion though? maybe on the west? revolutions happen by convincing your fellow brothers, not by force or manipulation.

this is the hard part imo, we all have to go against the media machine.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 14 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 15 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

That's why it's important to communicate with them rather than alienating them.

[–] gravityowl@lemm.ee 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You're talking as if for over a year (cough decades cough) Palestinian activists hadn't tried talking to the liberals about their party's unshakable support for the ongoing genocide.

What's left to say to people who are "going to pick the lesser of 2 evils" even when you showed them that their pick is still funding the ethnic cleansing of all Palestinian people?

We should talk to general leftist people. Not the liberals. They still value money and profit over people

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

i probably would have taken that liberal stance long ago, but i had people explain their views to me in a good way that eventually made me rethink some of the things i held as truth. its just that it doesnt happen overnight. im not saying anyone will be convinced but the socialist strategy of getting people talking about political topics in a consistent organized way actually helps a lot here.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Why? They will side with fascism over leftism every time.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

That assumption isn't true. Socialists aren't born that way, most come out of the status quo ideology of liberalism. By abandoning all liberals with blanket statements, we'd simply self-fulfill that prophecy. Even US libertarian militias, a peak of liberalist ideology, have sometimes sided with antifascists over fascists (see: Redneck Revolt lines of affiliation with American Pit Vipers).

You're referencing a real trend, and there's a kernel of truth behind it, however it's harmful to the socialist movement to assume that as a universal inevitability.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 2 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

There aren't enough leftists to win with violence, so our only hope is to win with dialogue. What's your plan?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Dialogue can't change the mode of production, so we must create more leftists so revolution becomes feasible.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

agreed -- how do we make more leftists though?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago

Exactly. Talking. Violence isn't going to make more leftists.

That said, call me paranoid but I think three-letter organizations are the main obstacle to organizing. I don't know what to do about that.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

By telling potential allies they're as bad as the enemy of course! It'll start working any day now.

The leftists have their own magical thinking and it's seems be to inherient to the movement. But unlike rightist magcial thinking, one cannot bully their way to a leftist paradise so right wins and will always win until the leftists compromise. No sign of that happening in my life time.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago

Liberals are the enemy though.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 12 hours ago

I disagree, so my plan is just violence

[–] bloubz@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Welcome to the world, this is not the US

Also, nah, socialists don't want to befriend fascists like Biden or Harris

[–] CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Apparently to some that's the goal. I had a chat with a leftist a while back while the US election was in full swing and she was absolutely against the concept of voting for a lesser evil, since the worse things get, the more people will turn to leftist extremism, which is a win in her book. Suffice it to say, that talk made me anything but sympathetic of her view...

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

And that is an accelerationist. Anyone champing at the bit for a violent revolution is deeply naive or deranged. We need to put the brakes on at all levels and speeding up extremism will only get innocents killed. The status quo sucks but anyone who has lived in a war torn nation can tell you a chained rabid dog is better than a loose one.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You're already committing genocide and killing innocents by the hundreds of thousands, there is no chain on the rabid dog that is the USA. Fuck comfortable US liberals who believe they should never have to be subject to what they do to foreigners: anything that destabilizes the US and brings the collapse of its empire closer is a win.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world -1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Push an American liberal on their disgusting views and they inevitably try some bad faith troll, like pretending to be illiterate as you are doing