this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
665 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

59555 readers
4688 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 198 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I wish just once we could have some kind of tech innovation without a bunch of douchebag techbros thinking it's going to solve all the world's problems with no side effects while they get super rich off it.

[–] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago (3 children)

... bunch of douchebag techbros thinking it's going to solve all the world's problems with no side effects...

one doesn't imagine any of them even remotely thinks a technological panacaea is feasible.

... while they get super rich off it.

because they're only focusing on this.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Oh they definitely exist. At a high level the bullshit is driven by malicious greed, but there are also people who are naive and ignorant and hopeful enough to hear that drivel and truly believe in it.

Like when Microsoft shoves GPT4 into notepad.exe. Obviously a terrible terrible product from a UX/CX perspective. But also, extremely expensive for Microsoft right? They don't gain anything by stuffing their products with useless annoying features that eat expensive cloud compute like a kid eats candy. That only happens because their management people truly believe, honest to god, that this is a sound business strategy, which would only be the case if they are completely misunderstanding what GPT4 is and could be and actually think that future improvements would be so great that there is a path to mass monetization somehow.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago

That's not what's happening here. Microsoft management are well aware that AI isn't making them any money, but the company made a multi billion dollar bet on the idea that it would, and now they have to convince shareholders that they didn't epicly fuck up. Shoving AI into stuff like notepad is basically about artificially inflating "consumer uptake" numbers that they can then show to credulous investors to suggest that any day now this whole thing is going to explode into an absolute tidal wave of growth, so you'd better buy more stock right now, better not miss out.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah my management was all gungho about exploiting AI to do all sorts of stuff.

Like read. Not generative AI crap, but read. They came to us and said quite literally: "how can we use something like ChatGPT and make it read."

I don't know who or how they convinced them to use something that wasn't generative AI, but it did convince me that managers think someone being convincing and confident is correct all the time.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Being convincing and confident without actually knowing is how 9/10s of them make it to the C suite.

That’s probably why they don’t worry about confidently incorrect AI.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Salesmanship is the essence of management at those levels.

Which brings us back around to the original subject of this thread - tech bros - in my own experienced in Tech recently and back in the 90s boom, this generation of founders and "influencers" aren't techies, they're people from areas heavy on salesmanship, not actually on creating complex things that objectivelly work.

The complete total dominance of sales types in both domains id why LLMs are being pushed the way they are as if they're some kind of emerging-AGI and lots of corporates believe it and are trying to hammer those square pegs into round holes even though the most basic of technical analises would tell them that it doesn't work like that.

Ultimately since the current societal structures we have massively benefit that kind or personality, we're going to keep on having these kinds of barely-useful-stuff-insanely-hyped-up cycles wasting tons of resources because salesmanship is hardly a synonym for efficiency or wisdom.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah yours is a more thorough and less flippant description of what I meant.

We used to make fun of all the corporate word salad that the Managment would use at my last “real” job. But it really was weird salad all the way down [up].

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

No no, I disagree I think that shoving AI into all these apps is a solid plan on their behalf. People are going to stop recall and shut it off. So instead they put AI components into every app, It now has the right to overview everything you're doing and every app collects data on you sending it home to update their personalized models for you so they can better sell you products.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

True, they just sell it to their investors as a panacea

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Some are just opportunists, but there are certainly true believers — either in specific technologies, or pedal-to-the-metal growth as the only rational solution to the world’s problems.

Andreessen is pretty open about it: https://a16z.com/the-techno-optimist-manifesto/

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I think Andreessen is lying and the "techno optimist manifesto" is a ruse for PR.

a16z has been involved in various crypto pump and dumps. They are smart enough to know that something like "play to earn" is not sustainable and always devolves into a pyramid scheme. Doesn't stop them from getting in early and dumping worthless tokens on the marks.

The manifesto honestly reads like it was written by a teenager. The style, the tone, the excessive quotes from economists. This is pretty typical stuff for American oligarch polemics, no?

[–] oyo@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

Of course most don't actually even believe it, that's just the pitch to get that VC juice. It's basically fraud all the way down.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)