this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
220 points (90.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35908 readers
1270 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 130 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

We already had four years so technically we would only get another four.

Until SCOTUS says the constitution isn't constitutional and gives him a literal crown.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 83 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That's the scary part. They'll gladly approve his term limit extension.

[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 40 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That's how Putin did it; probably the guy guiding all of this.

They have term limits over there in Russia as well, but they have interpreted it as "only allowed X years in a row"...so Putin installs a crony for 1 session every X years, and then magically wins the votes by a landslide every other time.

That's what they'll end up doing. They'll 'interpret' it as consecutive terms, and we'll get 8 years of Trump, then 4 of Vance, then 8 of Trump, etc.

[–] chetradley@lemm.ee 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Your scenario implies Trump lives to 98, and unless the preservatives in big macs are the key to longevity, I doubt he makes it that long.

[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I keep actually forgetting how fucking OLD that guy is...yeesh.

[–] pound_heap@lemm.ee 13 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Russian Constitution literally had this phrase "A same person cannot be a President for more than two terms in a row", so it was already opened for an interpretation they did. This actually had changed for just "two terms" in 2020, but provided another excuse for Putin to be elected.

Anyhow, in US Constitution the 22nd amendment says that "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice", so there is no room for interpretation. Even conservative SCOTUS would not do that.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

They'd write off Trump by then anyway. They'd hand the reigns to Vance, and go FULL project 2025 while keeping the Magats allegiance to Vance, while extending HIS term limits.

Not that my scenario is any better.

[–] pound_heap@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Who are "they"? Child trafficking democrats? Oh, sorry, it was from another conspiracy theory.

No offense, I just think that the idea of some masterminds ruling everything from behind the curtains is a bit ridiculous.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

No, you're right. It's essentially the same as "God's will".

A mysterious power you can't see or prove that manipulated everything you don't understand.

It's a really easy rut to fall into.

[–] ninja@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Run for VP with crony as pres. crony resigns. Wasn't elected as President. Loophole!

[–] pound_heap@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, this scenario seems... feasible. I've read people were contemplating Obama to run for Kamala's VP before Waltz was chosen. And this attempt would certainly end up in Supreme Court.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago

Well then they will have to slightly extend the term (until death do them part)

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I mean it’s literally right there in the Constitution without room for interpretation. If the Supes pretend to just throw that out then we’ll have an actual civil war on our hands.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago

He's been saying that if he wins, nobody will ever need to vote again.