this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
371 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19043 readers
3880 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 122 points 22 hours ago (7 children)

I'm a lifelong fan of political dramas. I watched the BBC version of House of Cards and adored The Manchurian Candidate.

There's stuff going on in this election that makes everything I ever read seem placid and tame.

[–] assembly@lemmy.world 111 points 21 hours ago (35 children)

Republicans would vote for the corpse of Trump before even considering not making a terrible decision. I cannot believe that this election is this close. It’s mind boggling that the outcome is currently a toss up between Nazi spray tan confused grandpa and middle road politician.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 42 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

The point isn't to get Trump into the Whitehouse; it's to get Vance into the whitehouse.

Trump will legitimately kick the bucket within the next four years, guaranteed. And Vance will be the one to take his place. Vance will be the one who is suddenly an "incumbant" backed by the heritage foundation who is actually reasonably well spoken, able to debate, far smarter than Trump, and younger.

Vance wasn't "chosen" by Trump, he came as a part of the deal with the Heritage Foundation to get him elected.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

My hope is that after Herr Trump finally croaks there will be a power vacuum in the party. Sure if he's elected and it happens in office there will be an effort to consolidate around Vance, but you know some looked over pissant is waiting in the wings to try to take the reins. If he's not elected it will likely be much more tumultuous. Here's hoping.

[–] flying_mechanic@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Trump is a figurehead and mouth piece only, it's clear the backing and power behind him is pushing him, not the other way around. If Trump is dead or unelectable then they will sub in someone else. Trump's "saving grace" is that he was good at speaking in a relatable but obfuscating way which worked to foment the masses against imagined grievances, but that's not a trait unique to him. He is unfortunately replaceable with not much loss in momentum.

[–] drphungky@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Trump is definitely not a "figurehead only". He is a tiger that what's left of the Republican establishment has by the tail. They did not want him to win the primary again, they all hate him, and are just trying to get whatever judicial appointments and erosion of regulations they can out of him. Anyone who thinks Trump is a puppet is absolutely blind to American politics. He is an absolute wildcard that everyone is trying to react to, a whirlwind that folks hope they can push in the direction they want to destroy the things they want, but they are equally aware they can fall out of grace and be fired in two weeks like everyone in his last administration.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Trump will legitimately kick the bucket within the next four years, guaranteed.

Putin is furiously trying to figure out how to put polonium into a Big Mac

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

This is nonsense. Putin and Trump are allies.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 11 points 17 hours ago

If he died tomorrow Republicans would be Black-Friday-75%-off-smart-tvs trampling each other to be the one to skin him and wear him so they could continue the coup.

load more comments (33 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

If you wrote this election into a political drama ten years ago, it'd get rejected as not believable.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 15 points 19 hours ago

True story I have told so many times....

Right after the 2016 election the NY Times assembled a panel of all the creators of the top TV political dramas. House of Cards, West Wing, Scandal, Veep...

Every creator said the same thing. If they'd had a character say that they "liked soldiers who didn't get captured" the networks and advertisers would have demanded that character be shown as hated by all Americans and voted out by the next episode.

Meanwhile you have MAGooswho also fly the black POW/MIA flag next to their Trump flag

[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

::: spoiler Yeah but not until he pushes Maggie Haberman in front of a subway. That will be the turning point for me. :::

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Haven't seen any shoes coming off yet, there's still time though.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

That reference eludes me. If it's from HOC, forgive me; haven't watched either version in a while.

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Hillary Clinton being picked up and thrown in a car by one of her bodyguards when she seemed a little faint. Much of the internet concurred "The shoe come off - she dead."

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 4 hours ago

Indeed. Hilary did eleven hours of grilling over Benghazi and never broke a sweat.

Donnie gets the vapors having to debate Harris.

[–] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's referring to the internet joke. In gifs of crashes/falls/other assorted bodily injury, if the person's shoes fly off, then they probably died. If not, probably alive.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 4 hours ago

That makes sense.

[–] icerunner_origin@startrek.website 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Have you read Neal Stephenson's novel, Interface?

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

lol! Yes, yes I have.

I'll see and raise you. "The Porkchoppers" and "The Fools In Town Are On Our Side," both by Ross Thomas.

Thomas was a Washington reporter turned crime novelist. The first book is about a Union election and the second is about an attempt to clean up a small Southern city by making the corruption so bad that even the pimps will vote for reform.

[–] icerunner_origin@startrek.website 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

More to add to my neverending reading list 😊

[–] dulce_3t_decorum_3st@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

It’s more ‘I, Claudius’ in my view

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 5 points 19 hours ago

https://youtu.be/roI56_c_E6o

Really good breakdown of how the show used camera movement to tell the story.

Didn't think I'd enjoy it as much as I did.

Let me know what you think, okay?

[–] Odd_so_Star_so_Odd@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

FPTP-voting was created by wealthy romans to benefit wealthy romans, that anyone uses this system today is just bonkers to me and probably why this comparison of yours is not so far removed at all.

[–] Arsecroft@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 19 hours ago

Read it and liked it.