this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
220 points (98.7% liked)

Games

32689 readers
1130 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fishos@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Unpopular opinion: open world ruined Zelda. I thought I'd love the concept. But actually give it to me? Ughhh.... Spend forever doing side quests because you don't know if the equipment will only be good now or if youll need it down the road.... No real guidance so you can end up just meandering around.....

I liked the more structured narrative. Don't get me wrong - it's cool to play Link and just do whatever you want. But for a story game, a more defined linear path is more engaging imo.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wasn’t Zelda always open world? LttP was about as open world as they come back in the day?

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Open world while still needing to go through the temples in a certain order. Various gadgets were required to progress, but crafty players often got around this. Pokemon would also be called "open world", but could you just walk up to the Elite 4 from the beginning? Nope, had to get them badges first.

There's "open to exploration" open world and "here's a giant map, go wild"(a la Fallout/Skyrim). I prefered a Zelda with more guidance. Even Wind Waker, arguably the most open world, still had a progression the game tried to keep you on.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah so today there’s more of a spectrum. Back in the 80s and 90s there were far fewer choices.

I get what you mean though, just wanted to point out it’s more complicated to judge older games by new standards. Eg. if Zelda were a new franchise it might just be a fully open world from the get go.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

How is saying it's not the same game mechanics "judging it by different standards"? That right there is the problem: this idea that everything modern is better. Not everything needs all the same features tacked on.

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

BotW and TotK are some of my favorite games of all time, but I really do hope we get another big dungeons focused game in the future.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

To me, they would be perfect games if they weren't Zelda. That is to say, they are great games, just not what I expect from a Zelda game. Something I'd expect from Bethesda moreso(style, not gameplay lmao).

I feel like Wind Waker was the right balance between freedom and linear story.

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

They used og Zelda as an inspiration for it

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Just pretend it's not a Zelda game then