this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
372 points (98.7% liked)

Games

32263 readers
1107 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] june@lemmy.dbzer0.com 63 points 1 month ago (4 children)

They said patent violations, not copyright, so it is about some sort of mechanic or system and not the pals or any specific designs. I'm guessing the thrown ball capture system, since it seems no other developers have published anything using that specifically.

[–] RogueAozame@programming.dev 17 points 1 month ago

They shouldnt be able to sue for that cause a patent only lasts for 20 years in Japan. I saw some guesses that there might be a patent for one of their legends games that they are suing for.

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

World of Final Fantasy is as close to a Pokemon rip off as you can get, and they didn't get sued.

Edit. And now I think about it, the mobile game of Rick and Morty was very much a reskin of Pokemon.

[–] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Actually ARK does this with cryopods.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago

World of Warcraft's pet capture system was actually very similar to Pokemon, including better traps with better chances of success.