this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
434 points (97.4% liked)

World News

38839 readers
2299 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I haven't checked the article linked. I could swear about a month ago I saw a headline saying the ozone hole was slowly recovering?? No?? NASA backed research or something? Did I imagine it all?

[–] Erasmus@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah you aren’t imagining it. I recall reading one a while back saying the hole in the ozone layer over Antartica was healed. I cannot find the article in particle but a quick google search turned up this one that said it closed in 2021

Edit: Antartica

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah I thought I saw one around here recently that said it had recovered since the 80s or 90s since we stopped using certain aerosols and refrigerants.

[–] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Best guess is the ozone is super sensitive to pollution and covid restrictions stopped.

[–] SamboT@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Your best guess is wrong :)

[–] USSEthernet@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If everyone who could WFH did, I'm sure the lower carbon emissions from so many fewer cars on the road would have been a large help. Buuut noooo gotta be in the office so you can see me type a little.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Carbon emissions don't contribute to the ozone hole, only certain pollutants

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You gotta be in the office so you stay in your district. If you could live anywhere and work the same job it would fuck up the gerrymandering

[–] Lev_Astov@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'm surprised I haven't heard that as an explanation for the anti-wfh people yet. That's a good one.