this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
163 points (89.0% liked)

Memes

45729 readers
1131 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] amotio@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

That is a good point, but analog clocks are IMHO in the realm of sundial clocks or audio casettes or floppy discs. Technology that was once usefull, but now it's replaced by better alternatives. Time is after all just a number, and it does not matter how we choose to represent it.

[–] BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Digital isn't better it's just different. Also a tonne of wristwatches are still analogue.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

It absolutely is tho. Usually more precise, 1:1 translatable into written text, can use the superior 24h system and uses the same reading system that is already taught in school anyways.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Right! Just to prove a point, I am going to make an NTP enabled rolex, and sync it to my microsecond accurate local NTP server! :P

[–] Incandemon@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, I did have a watch that automatically synced itself to the us naval observatories atomic clocks over the air.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah, but you need to factor in the distance to the transmitter. Going to add at least a few microseconds to your time accuracy!

[–] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

"Ususally more precise" > This depends on how precisely it is set, not on the display. Unless it's a connected watch, but then it's much more expensive and less energy efficient.

"1.1 translatable into written text" > Both are, you're reading the same number

"Uses the superior 24h system" > Adding 12 to a number isn't complicated. And with habit, most people who use analog watches and the 24h system know which position of the needle means what number in 24h format without doing the math. Some clocks don't even have digits. Unless you've been sedated and woke up in a room without windows, you'll know which side of 12 you're on. And otherwise, you've got more pressing issues.

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

There's nothing stopping an analog clock face from representing 24h time:

Image

[–] Emmie@lemmings.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

🤢 what an utter abomination

This is why puppies die

[–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

I was ready to hate it but after a good look, it doesn't look that bad. Doesn't work for small wristwatches but could look nice for a big wall clock.

[–] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wristwatches are just jewelry at this point tbh. They've been rendered completely redundant by cell phones. The only people under 60 who wear them are doing so as a fashion statement.

I'm sure a lot of wristwatch stans will downvote me but I don't care I'm still right

[–] variants@possumpat.io 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Watches are just more convenient. You don't need to carry a phone everywhere and with texts and calls showing on the watch you don't need to find your phone to check.

I use my watch with alarms/ timers to know when I need to clock out or in from lunch etc while I mostly leave my phone at my desk while at work so if I'm walking around the building I still get my alerts through my watch

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 3 months ago

Watches that can get alerts can show digital time. So, chalk another point up for not learning analog time.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 3 months ago

Knowing a clock is more than just telling time.

When you're walking with your homies you gotta be able to call out "gyat 3 o'clock" , so your fellow bros know where to look.

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Absolutely not comparable to floppy disks. The hands are a representation, not a technology. Technology-wise, most modern "analog" wristwatches are quartz, and therefore digital, not actually analog. Yet we choose to make them with hands because that provides a better representation of the passing of time.

[–] flerp@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Technology-wise, most modern “analog” wristwatches are quartz, and therefore digital, not actually analog.

Wat.. that's not how that works. Quartz watches can be digital or analog but what matters is whether it has a digital display or analog hands.