this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
354 points (97.1% liked)

Science Memes

10652 readers
3502 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 55 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I work in manufacturing. The engineers at my plant think everything works like it does on their computer screens. I had one of them tell me the mix needs exactly 248.73kg of a product and they were shocked when I told them we just add five 50kg bags and don't actually weigh out 248.73kg.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I can tell you they're not Electronics Engineers.

Electronics Engineers are like "we have to design this so that it can handle a power source whose voltage can be between +5% and -20% of what it says on the box" or "assume the resistance of your resistors, the capacitance of your capacitors and the inductance of your inductors can be randomly off by up to 10% plus it changes with temperature".

I switched from Physics to EE at Uni and it went from "these formulas represent the world" to "here is the empirically measured curve of gain vs temperature (were the difference between extremes is over 1000%) of a common transistor you'll have to use".

Maybe it's the area within Engineering or maybe Engineers get taught differently over there, but at least half of my degree was about dealing with how the real world deviates from the "purity" of Mathematical Formulas.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 11 points 2 months ago

Lol tell me about it, only half the time there's no datasheet and you have to kill them until you work out how the little fuckers work

[–] Sc00ter@lemm.ee 24 points 2 months ago

Thats just the difference between a good engineer and a bad engineer. A good engineer designs things around how others are going to use them, and the design with tolerance. They would have known you use 50kg bags, and realized that's what you're going to do.

In my field, we know people are gonna put things together with a hammer if it's too tight, so if it's intentionally a tight fit, we make it so there's no room to swing a hammer

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ask them if they know what SUPAC is and when they say no just shake your head and mumble "fuckin engineers" and never explain it to them.

Scale up post approval changes allow you that 10% variance in non active ingredients.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I just pointed out that our scales are only accurate to 0.5kg. How did he think we were measuring out 0.73kg when our scales don't have that amount of accuracy? If anything I thought an engineer would know about significant digits!

[–] Soulfulginger@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The funny thing is, the very first thing engineers learn in almost any class is significant figures and to make sure an answer makes sense in a real life scenario. Obviously not everyone is the same in terms of how they apply things, but engineers are definitely taught not to do stuff like that

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The engineers need a "factory day". They spend a day trying to do the work they specify and it all gets tossed at the end of the day. They learn the scale is off, shit comes in 50 kg bags, and temperatures vary.

The factory guys could have an office day to learn about the paperwork and money.

Send both groups to do something fun after.

[–] Sc00ter@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

When I was a coop (intern), and I'd run out of work assigned to me, I'd head down to the floor or a lab and just talked to people. In 6 months, I knew more about the process than people who had been there years

[–] variants@possumpat.io 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Engineers that make things make sense in real life scenarios cost too much

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

As a contract process engineer with quality background/certs, I 100% agree. I charge stupid money.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I used to run large batch bulks where the load cells were only 0.5kgs and we had "aquired" a product that was in good old English standard measurements and when they converted it, they didn't even attempt to round/floor/ceiling/common sense.

I put in purchase orders for enough equipment to get it done the way they wanted. We adjusted the batch scale accordingly.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 8 points 2 months ago

The amount left over/wasted across the five bags is probably approximately 1.27kg so it all works out

[–] BugleFingers@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh design engineers will make something absolutely functional... In theory, but the people on the manufacturing floor are scratching their head looking at a print for a perfectly hollow sphere with no blends, hole, seams, or affixes made from a single piece of steel going WTF guys? (This is an exaggeration ofc)

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

rotomolded steel sphere you say...

[–] BugleFingers@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Well I did say steel so centrifugal casting may be more appropriate since rotomolded is typically a resin. However it still leaves machining to be done.

Though all this was mainly meant to be in a CNC machine shop setting where neither of those are options, hence the exaggerated impossibility of creating it