rpg

3175 readers

34 users here now

This community is for meaningful discussions of tabletop/pen & paper RPGs

Rules (wip):

Do not distribute pirate content
Do not incite arguments/flamewars/gatekeeping.
Do not submit video game content unless the game is based on a tabletop RPG property and is newsworthy.
Image and video links MUST be TTRPG related and should be shared as self posts/text with context or discussion unless they fall under our specific case rules.
Do not submit posts looking for players, groups or games.
Do not advertise for livestreams
Limit Self-promotions. Active members may promote their own content once per week. Crowdfunding posts are limited to one announcement and one reminder across all users.
Comment respectfully. Refrain from personal attacks and discriminatory (racist, homophobic, transphobic, etc.) comments. Comments deemed abusive may be removed by moderators.
No Zak S content.
Off-Topic: Book trade, Boardgames, wargames, video games are generally off-topic.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Avogadro@ttrpg.network

sirblastalot@ttrpg.network

TripHammer@ttrpg.network

Primarch@ttrpg.network

BrentTaylor@ttrpg.network

Wizards of the Coast confirms it is not selling the d&d IP to tencent (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 9 months ago by eerongal@ttrpg.network to c/rpg@ttrpg.network

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] zifnab25@hexbear.net 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

they might have been more hands-off than Hasbro went it comes to mucking with the business model,

Hasbro was extremely hands off for a long while. But then their toy lines fell apart and their board game revenue just became "How many times can we sell you the same box of Monopoly pieces?"

Suddenly WotC was their revenue stream, and the head managers decided they needed to apply their magic touch to the franchise.

I don't really care, because D&D is more a style of playing than a product for sale. Sucks to see Faerun or Eberon cannibalized by these ghouls, but there's just so much fucking material out there that's never going away.

It's just not a game you can ruin (and 4e fucking tried, let me tell you). Too much of it is bound up in what you and your friends bring to the table.

[–] JohnBrownsBussy2@hexbear.net 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I agree that D&D will always exist, I am just personally uninterested in the direction the game is going with the OneD&D, and I think the source of this muddling path is do to the failure of the original business maneuver with the OGL revision. I don't really see things getting better under Hasbro, so any major shakeup might be a good thing overall.

[–] zifnab25@hexbear.net 1 points 9 months ago

I am just personally uninterested in the direction the game is going with the OneD&D, and I think the source of this muddling path is do to the failure of the original business maneuver with the OGL revision.

I absolutely agree. Although, I think the consequences of that decision has been something of a "Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom!" D&D-knock-off renaissance. And I'm pretty happy with that, given how a lot of my old favorites from Palladium and Rollmaster and GURPS seem to have found some new life.

I don't really see things getting better under Hasbro, so any major shakeup might be a good thing overall.

I would love to see the Onyx Path (ie, old White Wolf) folks find their legs again. Miss myself some old school Vampire: The Masquerade.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 9 months ago

I’m with you. I’ve been unhappy with the direction D&D has been moving for a couple of years now, and the rumours about the licensing changes were enough that in December 2022 I bought the Pathfinder 2e Core Rulebook. When I started a new campaign in 2023 I used that system, and I have certainly not looked back. It’s a great system from a game design perspective, but even better from now it treats its IP. I love the fact that everything is available completely open and free.