this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
89 points (88.7% liked)

Linux

48371 readers
1701 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago (3 children)

What is "fully-capitalist hardware?"

[–] huf@hexbear.net 1 points 10 months ago

it sanctions other CPUs and strong arms them into giving up their cycles

[–] Reil@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Now witness the firepower of this fully armed and capitalist hardware.

Fire at will, commander.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

No, not the Bootlicker Beam!

[–] Jknaraa@lemmy.ml -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Same sort of deal as "anarcho-communist" operating systems. @@

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That answers absolutely nothing. Do you think Capitalists designed hardware, or Engineers?

[–] drndramrndra@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well you solved that conundrum rightly. Now let's go linch those dirty Apple and John Deere engineers. Since they've designed those machines, they must be the only responsible parties for designing them with their extreme anti-consumer and anti-repair policies. They must get commissions on every licensed repair or something, it's definitely got nothing to do with capitalists putting restrictions on the design team in order to increase profits, nope...

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

You're completely off on what I'm getting at. The idea of "Capitalist" hardware, as though the Capitalist did the labor, is wrong. Engineers are paid for their labor power, they don't typically get royalties or anything of the sort, just like any other laborer.

Someone saying that FOSS software relies on Capitalist hardware is putting the Capitalist over the Engineer, as though the Capitalist created the hardware, and not the labor of the miners, assemblers, designers, engineers, and so forth, regardless of who owns the Capital the labor is done by the Workers. FOSS is agnostic to whoever owned the Means of Proruction of the hardware using or producing it.

[–] Jknaraa@lemmy.ml -2 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Do you think Capitalists designed hardware, or Engineers?

I'm just gonna leave this quote as is, so you can think about it.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago

I have. Engineers, ie workers, designed the hardware. It was not the Capitalists that owned the companies doing the design.

[–] axont@hexbear.net 1 points 10 months ago

Are you saying capitalists and engineers are one in the same? Maybe sometimes, but it's not capital that makes things, it's labor.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How the hell did you pick lemmy.ml?

[–] Jknaraa@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Because people aren't one dimensional objects.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

And that excuses a total lack of awareness.

[–] bear@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 months ago

It really seems like you didn't have an actual argument, you just wanted to whine and duck away from any pushback.