this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
852 points (98.6% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35552 readers
241 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

That massive spike of 50c/kWh at the left looks tiny compared to today even though that's already insanely expensive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 61 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Do most Finnish people pay spot prices for electricity?

[–] Critical_Insight@feddit.uk 43 points 10 months ago (4 children)
[–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

Interesting.

At these temperatures, I can't imagine air source heat pumps being very efficient.

I would probably have a spare gas, oil or wood based heater and use that for days like this, or for if the power goes off on days like this.

[–] Zaros@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Older houses definitely have them... but there was this trend at some point to renavate older houses and remove the oil heaters and fireplaces and wood heated saunas, and replace everything with electric ones. Why? No idea, trends are weird.

[–] psud@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Electricity is usually less polluting than the various fuels, wood fires especially will fill a valley with smoke, the rest are mostly to avoid the carbon dioxide

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Carbon monoxide too... and chimney fires... don't forget about indoor emissions with open stoves... Even if you don't care about the environment, electric wins the health&safety race by a landslide. Forgetting to do the maintenance on a heat pump doesn't exactly carry the same risks as with a wood stove.

Heat pumps are expensive and electricity can vary in price (who in their right mind opts in to spot pricing without on-site power generation tho, what the hell). Still, it's not hard to see why everyone who can afford it is electrifying.

[–] psud@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Also Russian fossil fuels

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

What about a solar + electric heating?

[–] Linssiili@sopuli.xyz 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Well, here (in middle of finland) the sun set at 14:30, so there wasn't all that much solar energy available.

Also heat pumps are always at least as efficient as straight electric heating.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago

It think above -20C or so, cold weather heat pumps are still way more efficient than resistive electric heating.

Good R-factor insulation is probably the most important upgrade in OP’s case. There are people where I live in the Northeast who heat their homes almost exclusively with the waste heat from cooking, electronics or old incandescent lighting. They have like R-30+ homes and really neat ventilation designs for cooling in the summer too.

I had plans to build a tiny home with Vacuum insulated panels and a small marine stove for heat, until we had a child and plans changed.

Now I’m looking at a solar battery setup with geothermal heat pump that will probably cost nearly what the whole tiny home was gonna be.

[–] DanglingFury@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Solar is quite poor in Northern winters. Wind + solar + heat would be a better bet, but the battery required to heat your house for more than a day with low winds would be prohibitively expensive unless you added geothermal to the mix like a geothermal heatpump which is also very expensive. Betweem the gear, battery, geothermal, all installed your probably in the 80k$ range or more. A wood stove would be the best bet

[–] 018118055@sopuli.xyz 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Finland has about 5.2GW of wind capacity vs 4.3 nuclear. If it's a windy day the spot price will usually be low.

[–] DanglingFury@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Good point, for aome reason i was thinking more off-grid than load balancing economics. The battery would probably help lower power by filling when power is cheap and supplying when the rates spike throughout the day

[–] Bronzie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Newer models are actually.
We had negative 30 C the last two days and our air-to-air kept the whole upper floor comfortable. 90 m².

Granted it's a brand new and very well insulated house, but -30 bites well on those too!

Most houses up here have other electric alternatives or a fireplace.
Gas and oil are beyond abnormal to have and I think oil is even illegal in Norway now...
Don't quote me on that though

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wow, air to air even?

But do you know what the COP is at -30?

[–] Bronzie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Here is a link to it

I must make a small correction though: The last night with -30 it struggled a bit. Only managed to keep the upper floor at 19 °C so we had to turn on the cables to get over the peak.
I'm still mightily impressed by it though!
Max consumption was 32 kW/day, so roughly 4-5 € pr/day with our prices.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago

Heat pumps only work to about -4c.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 3 points 10 months ago (4 children)

It's the first time I hear about final consumers paying spot prices. What's the reason for it? Ecological activism?

[–] olutukko@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Because at its cheapest it can be even free. For a long time last summer it was only like cents, sometimes even cheaper and at best negative. And the fixed contracts have been expensive for a while now in finland. I'm paying 8cents/kwh with the conract I got last fall. I got it because I was skeptical about prices at winter and I'm so glad I took that contract

[–] vaionko@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And at one point, due to an error, it was tens of cents negative. You were literally getting paid to use electricity. Though, we're paying it back now.

[–] Critical_Insight@feddit.uk 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Some people were even running electric heaters outside. Stupid but hilarious.

[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Making a note to blame Finland when global warming turns Earth into a fireball.

[–] 018118055@sopuli.xyz 6 points 10 months ago

Fixed rates on renewal went crazy after the war started. Now it's possible to choose low-load times for running dishwasher etc. On average the spot price is lower than available fixed rates, although some lucky people locked in long cheap contracts before February 2022. Most of those will expire this or next month at latest. It's certainly easier to have a fixed price contract.

[–] Critical_Insight@feddit.uk 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Plans like that started gaining popularity in the recent years as in general they were cheaper than ones with fixed prices. Then because of the Russian invasion the prices skyrocketed with daily averages of even 30 and 40 cents and people were in deep trouble with their electric bills and many of them scrambled to get 20 - 30c/kWh, 1 to 2 year long plans to save their asses. However the spot prices then dropped back to 3 to 4 cents for the spring and summer and now those people were stuck with their fixed price plans and are paying 10x the spot prices. Personally I just decided to gamble with the spot priced plan as my 6c/kWh plan had just ended and the 8 to 12 cent plans are all 1 to 2 years long. Despite freak days like this, on average, I'm still probably paying less than I would have with a fixed price plan.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

So not mildly infuriating, but fuckaroundandfindout?

[–] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Anti-ecological maybe.

Consumers have chosen the spot deals because of the lowest possible prices with disregard to the high points and consumption.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I think the opposite. Price is usually high when demand is high because of cold temperature. Because of the high price, you're motivated to consume less, and that's a good thing for the grid. It's also a good thing for the carbon footprint because usually this is when the most polluting plants are activated, gas first, then fuel and coal. This is where protecting the consumer too much from the wholesale market volatility can be a problem, a fix price doesn't motivate the end consumer to adapt consumption base on supply/demand which is important to reduce carbon footprint, instead the country pollutes more than it would if people were more aware. The problem is rather the risk for personal finance. That's why I thought mostly ecological activists would be motivated enough to take this risk. But I forgot the possibility of very low prices on average.

[–] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

I'd see you as an exception to the spot consumers here. Very admirable perspective!

[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I’m surprised that those 30% don’t have batteries to shift load times

[–] Critical_Insight@feddit.uk 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Those batteries would never pay themselves back.

[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm in the UK on an agile tariff and I'm not quite so sure - it depends on a number of things. Sure my batteries were bought primarily to support my solar panels. but I've been making quite a lot of money this winter.

  1. There are times when it is windy and there is low demand, when prices actually go negative - fill your batteries and make money
  2. The differential between lowest and highest price per kWh is often 30p so filling up when it is 10p and using when it is 45p makes sense.
  3. The grid will sometimes pay you large amounts of money with a few hours notice that they will pay you a premium to discharge your batteries when demand is predicted to be extremely high - to avoid them cranking up coal power stations. In November and December I made £90 just from this - and I only have 5Kwh batteries.

I haven't run the figures on payback times if the batteries were just for shifting and not solar - but they might just pay themselves back.

[–] red@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The math has been done multiple times. The batteries don't pay themselves back, and also need to be replaced from time to time.

[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

Sure. But the math depends on electricity tariffs. And those change and therefore, so does the maths. it sounds like tariffs are pretty extreme currently

[–] psud@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Batteries on a plan like that, where they're part of a large virtual battery, do pay for themselves within warranty

Solar batteries never do. To rationally buy a battery one needs to put high value on backup power

[–] DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Is that actually a widespread practice anywhere? I'm in Switzerland and I don't think I've seen that anywhere (other than in one farm near me which is entirely covered in solar panels)

[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

In the UK domestic solar panels are quite common and new installations usually come with batteries. Agile 30-minute pricing tariffs are still new and fairly experimental, but people are rapidly realising that their batteries can be really useful when used to force charge/discharge based on grid demand. Octopus is probably the leader: https://octopus.energy/blog/agile-pricing-explained/

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago

I live in the northeast US and we looked into batteries. Unless you’re rolling your own and have a very specific home/garage layout installing them is really difficult. They have to be outside the living space, away from flamingo wall coatings and windows. And they need to be relatively climate controlled (not great in direct sunlight or frigid temps).

Until we start designing battery systems that can mount outside (away from the house, like propane tanks) within their own heat pumps to manage temps built in, it’s not going to be popular in climates like ours (which are very similar to Swiss and lower scandawegian climates).

They should probably be bigger metal boxes with sodium flow batteries and heat pumps, like we have now for utility boxes in some places. They could incorporate the smart/net meters required to pump back into the grid too.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago

Time to install a wood stove.