wholookshere

joined 4 months ago
[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 16 hours ago

I guess I expect the national energy commission to still regulate the plant to ensure safety standards are the same between public and private.

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 22 hours ago

Except they can't? Because the world itself doesn't repeat like that.

Also we're not talking a doubling of the area. We are talking 1:1 of the entire earth. Starting from satellite images.

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 23 hours ago

Agreed that it's valid if wonky.

It's why I compared it to the sentence structure. It just rings a little weird in my ear and that's why.

How about allowing journalists in to document?

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

When you see study, it's more statistical analysis of things.

So things like clinical studies doing studies on population of people.

Where this is more publication of a mathematical idea.

Source: have a degree in physics and it's one of those unwritten rules. Kinda like how English sentences have an order. The soft brown big bunny sounds wired.

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If your coming to a psudo-anonymous forum looking for honesty, your looking for a bad time.

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Buddy... Your on the internet here. You haven't even been honest in a post.

I see the common mistake of associating the left with authoritarianism.

China and such are not left. They're even further right to the point of fascism labeled communism.

Remebere communism/socialism is about the workers relation to the means of production. Chinese people do not own the factories they work on, so I'm not sure you can call them left.

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Chrome was started by google

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You are correct that the raisins would have other constraints to keep it from infitatly expanding into nothing. Not because it's not expanding but because it has external constraints like gravity keeping it there.

They do have expansion applied to them, but gravity and other things effecting space time would be keeping it on place.

As for attoms, I think you picture something solid. But there's not. The electrons are getting further from the nucleas, but it's still bound quantum mechanically to the attoms regardless of its position.

But then the nucleas isn't soldi either. It's made of smaller things yet, and so on and so forth. So inside would also be expanding. But again other forces at play would bind things together.

The expansion is also not a force. It can't overcome other forces so it keeps things in line.

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

So it does happen on a small local scale though. It happens on ALL scales.

But everything is expanding from everything. Meaning the observer is always centred of the expansion. This is because volume is constant. The rasins themselves do expand, but locally it's such a small scale (10^-23 m/s for our solar system).

This also works for how we understand the change in density. Volume is constant, but we've gone from infinitely dense to almost nothing.

view more: next ›