watty

joined 1 year ago
[–] watty@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

They used to not have the right to marry in the US, and many people advocate for that to return. In some places on this planet, they don't get the right to live.

There is no one even advocating to take rights away from straight people, let alone beheading them.

[–] watty@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

It's still a side pursuit. I have a full time job as a software engineer. I do sell the kites I make on occasion, but I have no intention of making it a proper source of income.

[–] watty@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Kite flyer, kite maker.

I've been flying multi-line, controllable sport kites for over half of my life. I attend kite festivals very frequently and occasionally travel throughout the US or internationally for kite festivals.

About 6 years ago, I started building my own sport kites. Now days, I have a workshop with 5 sewing machines, 2 3d printers, and other equipment, all of it revolving around kite making.

I can't really imagine my life without kites involved.

[–] watty@lemm.ee 20 points 8 months ago

Yes, you can blame Israelis. There is no excuse for genocide.

[–] watty@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"That’s what one real-estate agent claims in a video that went viral on the social-media platform TikTok"

Hardly a compelling source.

" he’s suggesting that companies such as Zillow are using the data they glean from people’s perusal of home listings on their sites to make decisions about which houses to buy as iBuyers."

Based on what exactly? Zillow used publicly available information about houses, just like everyone else does. Zillow traffic patterns had nothing to do with it and really wouldn't even be useful for that. Buying decisions were based on home value and forecasted ability to resell, not derived interest based on page views.

"Gotcher later argues that the company will buy 30 homes at one price, and then purchase a 31st home at a higher price. “What that just did is create a new comp,”"

False. Zillow literally excluded houses that it bought from its comps to avoid that bias. I know because I wrote that code.

[–] watty@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Zillow over payed for houses, then couldn't sell them as quickly as expected because the COVID housing market took a down turn, and so they sold them at a loss, lost millions of dollars, and closed the house buying business. They also made plenty of low offers or under-payed for houses at times. They were trying to break even on home value on the hole, but couldn't reign in the wild swings of gains and losses. Their entire business model was based on the seller fees, not on the house value.

In any case, they closed that business in 2021, and has since sold the rest of their inventory.

I don't see how that would have a lasting effect on housing prices though. I'd attribute it more to a housing shortage due to people buying up real estate, and keeping it as rentals. Even when operating, Zillow aimed to resell houses within 3 months, not hold on to them as investments.

[–] watty@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Based on the actual Zillow report, it's just based on home values across the board in different regions. So, these are averages. Of course, if you make more improvements and stuff, your result would vary.

[–] watty@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

You can just click through to the actual Zillow report instead of Yahoo's article about it: https://www.zillow.com/research/years-to-profit-33215/

They discuss the analysis right there.

[–] watty@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (8 children)

How did Zillow do this?