ugh

joined 1 year ago
[–] ugh@lemm.ee 14 points 7 months ago

I read some bickering about this amongst conservatives, and the reasoning seems to be:

  1. Conception should occur from sex because of the love between husband, wife, and God or something

  2. Typically, they'll harvest(?) multiple embryos, check if they are viable or have genetic abnormalities, then discard those that aren't viable or will result in major disabilities. To them, this is killing those unviable/unhealthy "babies". Sometimes the couple will freeze multiple embryos as backups, but not need them after a successful pregnancy (or more). Those microscopic globs of cells that they call babies are then "murdered". Their point is that this results in more deaths than lives.

I'm curious what their opinion would be if a woman wanted IVF after 5 miscarriages, was unable to get the treatment, and went on to have 7 more miscarriages, still without having a successful birth. To be real, fundie couples who refuse contraceptives and are hell bent on having a child could go through many more miscarriages than that.

[–] ugh@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They're insecure about their intelligence but too prideful to admit when they don't know something, even to themselves.

[–] ugh@lemm.ee 17 points 10 months ago

Education is the obvious fix, but at least in America, the idiots are trying to destroy it. If people learned critical thinking, almost everything else would fall into place. If we stopped reinforcing learned helplessness and made people practice logic and learn consequences, society would see a huge benefit. People need to be held accountable for their ignorance. Otherwise, they won't learn. Those who refuse to learn should rightfully be shunned, because they're the biggest propaganda weapon out there.

Cognitive dissonance is another major reason for idiocracy. The MAGAts are so blatant about their love for it. "Wokeness" is healing from cognitive dissonance, which they've labeled as a virus.

I'm sympathetic and offer to help someone if they're being a bit stupid (all of us have our moments), but if they refuse, that's where they should be held accountable.

[–] ugh@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

I have spent the past 3 years complaining about settling for Biden, but he's actually done a ton for the country in his short time. The media reports none of it. I still think voting for a non-dictator is worth the sacrifice for a 3rd party voter, which was me in 2020. The GOP has made their threats clear.

[–] ugh@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The headline is very misleading. Porn companies are considering facial recognition as an option for validating age. Governments are putting more pressure on porn websites to keep minors away from the content, but it's very hard to thoroughly prove your identity online. A government issued photo ID is useless if you have nothing to compare it to visually. That's why many websites use bank/credit card info as opposed to an ID.

It is definitely a privacy concern if you worry about it being known that you watch porn, but I don't think it's right to fault the company.

[–] ugh@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

I'd love to hear the black community's take on this. It smells racist, but I'm not sure. I think you're right that they're trying to take the angle that they're trying to help the black population instead of focusing on the tobacco industry as a whole.

[–] ugh@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Are Republicans any better, though? Granted, Trump did do more for black people since Jefferson /s

[–] ugh@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

I guess it would generate a bigger pool of people if they want to get super technical about who they want to genocide. US citizens already have to hand over their demographics to the government, but worst case... I could entertain that idea.

[–] ugh@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

That's a good point that I hadn't considered. I'm not sure how that would go over legally in the US. They could gather very similar information by looking at records from relatives who have used the same insurance company, even just financial records, but that is monitored closely by the government. I wonder if we'll be seeing any lawsuits in the near future.

[–] ugh@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago (5 children)

I struggle to see what someone could do with that information. My ethnicity is already known by the government and every advertiser collecting my information online. I randomly had my identity connected to my cousin's before any family took DNA tests. Her name would show up in those questionnaires along with what car I've owned and where I've lived when I had to go through online government stuff.

I'm relatively paranoid about giving out personal information, but I don't consider my spit very sensitive.

[–] ugh@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago

They don't care about women who are considering abortion. I'd be more worried that they'd implement a less reliable test.

view more: ‹ prev next ›