That's why I posted a link to an archived copy above
They're selectively touching the non-Tesla chargers
Per the article, it's
—Green infra —Bike infra —EV infra —Project purpose to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
So might well include HSR if any of the planning documents talk about reducing emissions.
I'd be happy with an FDR-like tax policy which means no more billionaires. But that's been blocked so effectively that I understand the desire for an eat-the-rich type solution.
Low income housing is the main goal of Habitat for Humanity. They just signed up to put solar panels on it.
But non-billionaires benefit from that, which is antithetical to the Republican party
Only when it proposes things that are good for people or heresy like "it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the Kingdom of God!"
They need to hear their constituents saying it to have a backbone
You need people whom they trust to start telling them the truth. It doesn't work if they don't trust the messenger
Nah. Musk and Trump are firing people doing the work, not asking for modest changes to language used. That's a huge difference
We didn't actually do stuff like have the military take down pictures of the Elona Gay because it was too gay though; people tried to get their actual job done in a way that's respectful of minorities.
You're right. Sorry that I don't have a mechanism besides payment to give out access on this one.