samus12345

joined 1 year ago
[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Not people who were born via Caesarean.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 19 points 4 days ago (9 children)
[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

Well, the original post was as well, so fair enough!

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 16 points 4 days ago (5 children)

This is anywhere on the internet.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 19 points 4 days ago (6 children)

The short term effect of voting for the "greater evil" (or not voting at all): straight to the far, far right.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

Although the graphics looked old even when it came out.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Not until graphics are significantly different enough, anyway. Arkham Asylum could pass as a modern game with a lower budget. No PS2, OG Xbox, or Gamecube game can be mistaken for a modern game, though.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 5 points 4 days ago

Retro-as-a-style used to be the ONLY meaning of "retro." It was something new that was made to look old. When it comes to games it usually just means "old" now. I personally consider the 360 and PS3 to be not retro because the general conventions of how they control and the way they were online and capable of getting updates is pretty much identical to today. They're old, all right, but other than having less polygons and post-processing effects they're not different enough from the games of today, as you said. The Wii is something of an anomaly and different enough that I'd consider it retro.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Receiving money in exchange for your labor is entirely different. You are being paid for providing a service, and no, the employer has no right to tell you what to do with money you have earned. When you beg for money, you are asking for someone else's resources to be given to you for nothing in return. That person is therefore directly using their resources to enable...something. They have a right to know what and decide if it's something they want to pay for. If the person giving doesn't care, fine, but it's the height of arrogance to think you have the right to take their money, no questions asked.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 6 points 4 days ago (4 children)
[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 8 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I was unable to find any images from the show where he didn't have sleeves, so they must be part of his body. Maybe they just slide around on the sides of him.

view more: ‹ prev next ›