randomname01

joined 1 year ago
[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 40 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You’re right, the actual chad move is torrenting and seeding.

[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 2 points 2 weeks ago

Heh, we use velo as well. And yeah, we don’t really stigmatise dialects that much either, though depending on how much dialect you use people might find it unprofessional.

[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It’s kinda funny, I’m Flemish and a lot of French loan words (ambriage, merci, nondedju = nom de dieu to name a few) are mainly used in dialect, and therefore don’t make you sounds sophisticated or worldly at all.

[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Meh, as a native Dutch speaker auxiliary verbs feel really utilitarian to me, and not particularly fancy - like you said, that’s highly subjective.

As for cases, I didn’t say Latin or German had the most, but just that I think they’re fancy and that Latin has them while French doesn’t.

[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 23 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

For one, Latin has more fancy rules than French. I guess the subjunctive is probably something English speakers might consider fancy, but Latin has that too. Latin has more times that are conjugations of the core verb (rather than needing auxiliary verbs), has grammatical cases (like German, but two more if you include vocative) and, idk, also just feels fancier in general.

I’ll admit it’s been years since I actually read any Latin and that I only have a surface level understanding of all languages mentioned except for French, but this post reads like it’s about the stereotypes of the countries rather than being about the languages themselves.

[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean, I guess there’s a point to that, but isn’t there inevitably a social aspect to it? Especially in this post, where the person is saying others don’t have to understand it, meaning it’s clearly outwardly visible and part of who they are.

I’m not saying you should seek approval from anyone (for your gender nor anything else), because that’ll never happen. But denying the importance of some social acceptance for things in the social sphere is kind of weird, and feels like a “haha, unless…?” thing; you want others to understand and accept it, but the moment you don’t their acceptance becomes irrelevant and you never sought any acceptance at all. It feels like an unhealthy way to cope with rejection.

[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 12 points 1 month ago

I think the language analogy is actually very apt, because not every has to understand it, but the people you want to speak French with necessarily have to know it. Otherwise it just doesn’t fulfil any purpose.

[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 29 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Also, because gender is a social construct, it requires that enough people understand it to a sufficient degree.

[–] randomname01@feddit.nl -1 points 3 months ago

Ok lol, my point remains exactly the same and I think your viewpoint is incredibly reductive.

[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That’s fair, and not an unreasonable choice. What I can’t get over is people acting like that’s the only reasonable choice, and that people who have children are idiots.

Just look around in this thread and you’ll see some smug ass attitudes. It kind of reminds me of those 14 year old kids who feel immensely smart because they’re atheist, you know?

[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 97 points 3 months ago

Clearly not the point of OP’s question though

[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 12 points 3 months ago

If they want Steam Deck to be a legitimate platform to target for developers - which seems to be the case and which seems to be working - they practically need to make sure they’re not refreshing it every 2-3 years with a spec bump. I’d personally be very surprised if Valve releases the next generation Steam Deck before 2026.

view more: next ›