quindraco

joined 2 years ago
[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they even did it. This is over a screenshot of a spreadsheet, not the spreadsheet itself, making it even easier to fake if someone was out to get them in trouble. I could make a pic of a spreadsheet claiming to be by BrikoX and doublejay1999 with maybe a minute of work in MS Paint.

[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I've never seen "dufus" spelled that way before, it's immediately enticing.- like you hybridized the word with "Rufus".

[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think you understand how insurance works.

[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 71 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Chiropracty isn't "scientific".

[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

We could always embrace capitalism by getting rid of corporations, like as a concept. They're a fundamentally anti-capitalist idea.

[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

That's not true. You don't have to ask someone to stop committing defamation before suing them for defamation.

[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Does it count as a tell when it's irrelevant? Everything Trump says is a lie. You can tell he's lying because his lips are moving. The addition of the word "Sir" doesn't change anything.

[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's fine, provided it's not a plot hole - i.e. your fantasy setting needs to not have abolished blindness as a realistic malady, which some settings do. E.g. LOTR 100% has blind people, while the Harry Potter universe only has very poor blind people, since solving blindness is as trivial as a polyjuice potion, even if nothing else works (and something more effective is bound to work).

[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The government can ban tobacco, but it's undeniably tyrannical to ban a drug because you don't like the consequences people are choosing for themselves.

[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Gerrymandering is legal, as is mentioned in the article. What's not legal is racial gerrymandering. If all a court does is find a map to be gerrymandered, it won't send it to anyone to be redrawn.

[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (11 children)

Banning specific guns is pure theater, even if it passes. There's zero real safety in it.

[–] quindraco@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You're agreeing with the rich people in this case when you say that. They got none of those things in this case. They're being taxed on money they could theoretically get.

 

view more: next ›