ploot

joined 3 days ago
[–] ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

“I’ve talked to so many governors and congresspeople and senators and never once did they say Canada is the problem,” Ford told CNN. He emphasized that a bilateral deal between Canada and the U.S. would be a better solution than imposing tariffs on Canadian goods.

I'm no fan of Doug Ford, but he's right here. I guess Trump's plan is to drive Canada into the ground economically through tariffs then invade or otherwise annex Canada when it's too poor and desperate to resist. But why? It would be more profitable to both the USA and Canada simply not to do any of this. There are only two explanations I can think of:

  1. Belligerence is the only thing Trump understands, even when it works to his own disadvantage, because actual diplomacy is too complicated for him and soft power contains the word "soft", and/or
  2. Trump isn't working for the interests of the USA, but rather for those who want to see NATO and other Western alliances destroyed.
[–] ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 14 hours ago

I don't think Canadians would have a problem with taking on Minnesota.

[–] ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 14 hours ago

They just keep voting for him, or not voting against him. Get it together Ontario!

[–] ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Republicans have only threatened to invade Mexico, Canada and the UK so far, with a few days to go yet until they take power. They're basically pacifists.

Edit: Oh, and Panama.

[–] ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is Fetterman still left-leaning? I heard he had gone Trumpy.

[–] ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 days ago

Maybe what I'm doing right now? I mean, it could be.

[–] ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago

Up you go, and soon it will.

[–] ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The difference between taxes and fees is really just that the first is cheaper and goes to people who aren't incentivized to pocket the money while providing the worst service they can get away with. If you push a libertarian to explain their story in detail, there always comes a point where they introduce government and taxes but try to call it something else.

[–] ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

They don't have any idea how cost-effective taxes are, compared to paying private companies individually for every single shared resource. It's the same for healthcare, education, etc.: to pay the government for a decent nonprofit service is always better value.