pbbananaman

joined 1 year ago
[–] pbbananaman@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

The MOND crowd pops up every now and then and makes some noise in the dark matter community. Evidence we do have points us toward matter, which is why we have billions being spent on detectors through various governments and collaborations around the world.

I’m not sure what direct detection experiments are going to do once we hit the neutrino floor.

[–] pbbananaman@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

This is how hackaday posts have been… for like a decade. I guess it’s somewhere between articles and link aggregator.

[–] pbbananaman@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Don’t look into the politics of the person who probably made those stickers!

[–] pbbananaman@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago

I just don’t really give a shit. I like the car and it works well for me and provides a lot of comfort. I’m sure the ceos of all the other car companies are equally as shitty as Elon but quiet so does it really even matter? Don’t kid yourself that you’re saving the world for buying a Volvo or Toyota instead of a Tesla.

[–] pbbananaman@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

There’s plenty of shelter space but you can’t do drugs there so people don’t go. But hey I guess you can use as much as you want in prison!

[–] pbbananaman@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

My Whole Foods just uses paper bags, so I guess this doesn’t affect me :shrug:.

[–] pbbananaman@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

I don’t think there needs to be a word that describes the negative of a condition. You just don’t need a descriptor at all. There’s no value add.

Inject vs eject? Am I being trolled here?

[–] pbbananaman@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (7 children)

The prefix seems unnecessary and doesn’t even make sense with your last example. Why is it needed when the a- prefix works perfectly fine to contrast with the existing word as-is?

[–] pbbananaman@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thanks this is a lot of great detail on the dosing mechanism that I think is really interesting. I love reading up on the experimental details and the actually components used to make these experiments work.

300mg of orally ingested THC spread out over 24 hours is about equivalent to consuming 1 typical candy/gummy every hour for 24 hours of the day. A reasonable or average or normal person would be uncomfortably high at these dosages. I also imagine the bioavailability of oral ingestion is less than the dosing mechanism you described although I’m not sure (is that getting taken up through the lymphatic system? How does it differ from oral ingestion or injection into the bloodstream?).

Fascinating stuff, thanks for sharing your knowledge.

[–] pbbananaman@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Maybe I’m misreading the only plot that mentions dosing numbers anywhere. It looks like the largest dosing group is getting 3mg/kg/day. That’s a lot scaled up to a 100kg person (like 10x a normal gummy for example).

[–] pbbananaman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But if the average is better, then we’re will clearly win by using it. I’m not following the logic of tracking the worst case scenarios as opposed to the average.

[–] pbbananaman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Just like all humans can do right now, right?

I never see any humans on the rode staring at their phone and driving like shit.

view more: next ›