obbeel

joined 2 months ago
[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 8 points 3 weeks ago

People need to come into contact with the Internet that isn't based on streaming asap. We need laws worldwide that prevent blocking access to knowledge - the most basic and guaranteed by constitutions worldwide right. Books, music, films and games. People should have at least some access to them. I can't imagine a world where I'm licensed to my books by Amazon. It's just awful. Something needs to be brought together before publishers make this a crime.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 1 month ago

I appreciate the honesty.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 month ago

Anyway, more access to the open source packages can't be bad.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 0 points 1 month ago

I think it said it's deprecated or something? I'm not sure, I just know I had problems downloading packages before.

I don't think it was setup.py . I think I tried to download it directly through pip install xx==0.4.0 or something (the version was required by the program) and it said the package doesn't exist.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 0 points 1 month ago

But do Appimages make the dependencies code available? They pack everything into one working program, but what about the packages?

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I couldn't download it even if I wanted to. That's what I mean. It returns a message saying it isn't supported.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And the UK have tested their laser weapons this year and took out a drone with them last month.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)

If prior versions were not support by pip anymore, so yes, if it were removed. There are cases of packages not being supported by the platforms, aren't there? I've run into cases where the package was fully deprecated and not useable or downloadable anymore.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What do you mean?

I just find that if pip did not support that version anymore, the software would be lost. As that is covered by making executables, as I mentioned them. But what if I wanted to have access to the libraries that were used in the program? That wouldn't be possible. Because all we get in the source code is the dependency fetching, not the dependencies themselves.

It would be good to have an alternative where you get all that you need to compile the code again, not depending on fetching them from websites that might not even have them anymore.

This mentality of ephemeral code just adheres to the way big tech would like to do things, with programmed obsolescence.

An alternative to that way of doing things would be nice and would make sure we get access to the same working open source program in 30 or 40 years.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 month ago

I don't know about where you live, but here the drug lords owns some territory. And within that territory, they take political actions like closing the nearby churches, for example. I think selling actual medication could serve their purpose very well. They already sell smartphones for a low price to the local people ($15).

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think you can link bluesky to your personal domain. I'm not sure how it works.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't want to make Mastodon propaganda, but Mastodon talks around technology are much better than Twitter ever was.

view more: ‹ prev next ›