markinov

joined 5 months ago
[–] markinov@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 10 hours ago

Sovereignty is British occupation

[–] markinov@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

3rd point depends on how the VPN advertises itself. If it advertises itself as nordVPN used to do then it's a scam. If it advertises itself what a vpn actually does then it's not a scam

[–] markinov@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

how? Your theory of "Their fear of China is greater" and it's a result of that falls as soon as we take into account the history of US being present in those countries even before china became powerful. It was US who expanded in those places even before PRC was a thing and china was fragmented, weak, occupied.

Philippines: U.S. Colonial Period: the United States ruled the Philippines from 1898 to 1946, The Philippines was under American civil and military governance.

south korea: after world war two the divide of korea and US occupation of south korea militarily which is still present

japan: similar story as south korea

[–] markinov@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

When China has so many fearful neighbors, that's a sign there's a serious problem with China.

The fearful neighbors:

Source: nytimes

[–] markinov@lemmygrad.ml 52 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

they can only say tiny miny square, that's the most what they know about china

[–] markinov@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

it’s only a matter of time till we get 9/11 with Chinese Characteristics to justify a hot war

[–] markinov@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Best way to explain is probably not explain at all in the beginning and let them create an account in a well federated instance. That will not make them confused and learn by using it.

[–] markinov@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

A map on the shift of bigger trade partner

[–] markinov@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Spiderman1, favorite since i was 10

[–] markinov@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Humanoid robots sound cool, but to me, task-specific robots are more cost-effective and easier to maintain. Humanoid robots are versatile, but as a result, they also requires much more complex engineering and production and more energy, which might not be necessary for the work they are intended to perform. For example, while a humanoid robot may be capable of performing household chores, a robot specifically designed for tasks like vacuuming or dishwashing will typically do the job more efficiently, as it is optimized for that particular task.

[–] markinov@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

Still onlyfans exists.

view more: next ›