henfredemars

joined 1 year ago
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I mostly agree with you. I find it really weird how I live in a world where all my Internet is being run through 5G cellular for political and social reasons and not for technical ones. Due to the monopoly on the cables, it’s actually much cheaper here to buy 5G home internet. It seems unnecessarily complicated and choosing to use a shared medium for no reason. It’s just the politics.

In case you’re not from the States, we have a monopoly pretty much everywhere for Internet services.

With my 5G I have unlimited data, and it’s 300 down 44 up on a good day. It’s perfectly serviceable if you can live with increased latency.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How do you know they don't just sell your data anyways?

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 100 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Pathetically weak flex cable and connector. Obvious problem and design weakness that's persisted for years.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think users who know what a NAS is probably know that information already. But true, yes!

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 31 points 1 week ago (6 children)

It doesn’t just benefit you. You’re benefiting the current users of that spectrum that for one reason or another might not be able to switch.

I suspect most users though couldn’t tell you what frequency their network uses let alone the devices on it.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 31 points 1 week ago

CEO: Maybe they're supposed to look like piles of rubble. I'm not quite sure. Why don't they just buy a new one? How much could a home cost anyway, $10?

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 37 points 1 week ago

Blatantly illegal appears to be all the rage these days.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 92 points 1 week ago (22 children)

Ensuring that the system complies with industry standards and integrating security measures for cross-technology communication are also necessary steps, Gao adds.

This is absolutely a huge factor that could make or break the technology if they don't do this perfectly. This could be the single most important part of the tech.

2.4 GHz is super saturated. The last thing we need is long range i.e. large footprint signals in already saturated spectrum. How this technology is deployed should either be not at all, or very carefully, to prevent widespread interference with existing WiFi devices. This spectrum is already on the verge of being complete trash. Please please do not be deploying more stuff on 2.4 spanning an entire "smart city."

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Seriously? I’m actually growing sick of all the positive posts I see about her. I feel like the support is overwhelmingly positive and extensive on here to the point where some people lose touch with reality.

However, I see you are from a different instance, so it’s entirely possible that we are not seeing the same feed. Cannot see what you are seeing from where I’m standing.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 4 points 1 week ago

Correct. It is self admitted I believe in the court records that only a fool would take anything said by them as fact.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Six days of Trump lies about the hurricane 🎵

To the tune of 12 days of Christmas.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 8 points 1 week ago

Username related. Don’t wait until the last minute.

view more: ‹ prev next ›