fkn

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] fkn@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago

Not having to interact with Nazis is tied to which instance I signed up on? I'm confused by this argument.

[–] fkn@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I think this makes them a good human... Since like 99% of humans are bad at math it makes sense since they would make this mistake....

[–] fkn@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Ah. I see. So it's not that you can't get them it's that they are expensive and you are looking for a reasonably priced way to get one. That makes sense.

[–] fkn@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Online? I'm confused, do they not ship to Greece?

[–] fkn@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Lol. This isn't my argument. This is your argument followed more completely.

You don't even know what my argument is or what my beliefs are. All I have done is point out your own hypocrisy.

[–] fkn@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (3 children)

You know how I know you are lying? Because your first reaction to me expanding on your argument was to tell me I am a sinner.

If you treat any of your "friends" that way you are truly a terrible person.

[–] fkn@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago (5 children)

You don't like being called a fundamentalist because you know they are abhorrent.

You don't like your own argument. You can't even stomach the inkling that your own hypocrisy.

[–] fkn@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago (13 children)

Even if we grant you your invalid position, you are still wrong. So close. You claim the unborn person has rights, but so did the mother.

In no legal jurisdiction in the United States is one person ever required to give up their bodily autonomy for another. This the mother, according to your argument, is under no legal obligation to provide the other person, according to your argument, the mothers body for any reason. If the mother wishes to discontinue the use of her body she can. If the other person dies as a result of this decision, the mother bears no responsibility.

This is well understood case law and common law.

GTFO with this terrible argument.

[–] fkn@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Separation of data between accounts makes them fall under different retrieval requirements.

As one account, a request for all of the data from that account contains both chunks. Separation of those accounts separates the need to accommodate requests for data from one on the other.

It can also mean that internally they may have a sufficient mechanism that data that was previously identifying to no longer being identifying (breaking userid to data pairings for example) which is sufficient to "anonymize" the data that it no longer needs to be reported or maintained.

[–] fkn@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

GDPR and pii reasons most likely. It's a nightmare keeping track of why certain data is on certain accounts. This can vastly simplify the GDPR compliance mechanisms. If your GOG account is merged with your PR account, there is probably significantly more "sensitive" data (CC numbers, addresses, etc) in the GOG account. This probably exempts some data that either cdpr or gog tracks from deletion or retrieval requests.

[–] fkn@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Exactly. The points you put together made no argument. I asked "so what?" And indicated that the points as presented appear to be the same points people use/put together to say: "so don't vote." / are used by the same group of people who are trying to disenfranchise or discourage voting. This is a common propaganda technique.

 

Recently I engaged in a bit of what I thought was a friendly meme exchange... But now that user has started following me into other unrelated subs and started targeted harassment.

Thanks.

 

If you are struggling, I would like to share my success with you and let you know that peace will come to you eventually.

 

This has probably been requested before, but can we get mod tools please?

view more: next ›