I don't think it's fair to blame the company. The employees' wages went up by 500%^[when rounding up to the nearest positive multiple of 500%], so prices also had to go up by 500%.
decayedproton
joined 2 years ago
I don't think it's fair to blame the company. The employees' wages went up by 500%^[when rounding up to the nearest positive multiple of 500%], so prices also had to go up by 500%.
The judge may well have deserved a life sentence for all the harm he did, so please don't think I'm defending him, but the reporting on this story has been disappointing.
So the previous administration decided he didn't need to be in prison, which is worth explaining. What was the reason? Did they find him to be reformed and worthy of living at home?
Doing the math, he has served a little more than 13 of his 17 year sentence. How many years did Biden commute? Is he being released within days, or did he only have one year taken off the end of his sentence, so that he gets out in 2027 instead of 2028? The article doesn't say.
Guardian, you just said that it was a commutation, not a pardon. How can you get it wrong in the very next sentence??? The most basic standards of accuracy would demand that you not contradict yourself so quickly.
And if the media wants this to be a scandal, they need to investigate the reason for the commutation. Did Conahan make contributions to Biden's campaign? It would be easy for a newspaper to find out one way or the other. Or was he asked to pay a cash bribe for a reduced sentence? Or did he spend the last 13 years volunteering and living a life that we'd admire if it wasn't for the things he'd done before? Or does he have a terminal illness and won't live past March? Or is he a close friend of a top official? We don't know... because the media wants to publish the story without first doing their job.