It's enforceable by Congress through their oversight and impeachment powers.
charonn0
joined 2 years ago
I don't think that works. You'd still have a situation where the plaintiffs are asking the court to decide US foreign and defense policy.
Which US laws are you talking about?
I'm referring to the lawsuit itself. It may be "very real", but it's also complete nonsense.
US courts don't rule on political questions, nor do they decide US foreign policy, nor do they provide advisory opinions. This lawsuit fails to state a cognizable claim and seeks relief that is beyond the power of the judiciary to grant.
Well, let's see, the lawsuit was filed in the United States, in a US court, and under US laws.
So, obviously, I'm talking about Outer Mongolia.
Have you actually read this lawsuit? It asks for things that US courts simply cannot do.
That's not how the courts work here.
I just thought "pirate-friendly" was concise.
tl;dr: The users' comments say that a certain ISP is pirate-friendly. Studios want to use the comments against the ISP (not the users).
Sure. But she's already got that, hasn't she?
Except what they ask for is beyond the power of the courts to grant.